ScholarLens Back to search
2004•bepress Legal RepositoryOpen access

Avoiding judicial liens in bankruptcy: Moldo v Charnock, 2004

Roger Bernhardt

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This article discusses a California case which held that 11 USC §522(f)(2) required avoidance of a creditor’s judicial lien, even though that lien was senior to a consensual lien.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article discusses a California case which held that 11 USC §522(f)(2) required avoidance of a creditor’s judicial lien, even though that lien was senior to a consensual lien.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article discusses a California case which held that 11 USC §522(f)(2) required avoidance of a creditor’s judicial lien, even though that lien was senior to a consensual lien.

Key concepts: Bankruptcy, Lien, Business, Finance

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Avoiding judicial liens in bankruptcy: Moldo v Charnock, 2004 — Research Paper | ScholarLens