1977Unpublished venueOpen access

Energy and cost analysis of residential water heaters

Robert A. Hoskins, Eric Hirst

Open full text 17 citations

Abstract

A detailed computer model is developed to calculate energy flows for residential electric and gas water heaters. Model equations are derived from applications of the first law of thermodynamics, analysis of manufacturers' literature, and related studies. The model is used to evaluate the energy (and associated initial cost) impacts of alternative designs to reduce water heater fuel use. Model results show that the largest heat loss in an electric water heater is conduction through jacket walls (14% of energy input). An additional 5% is lost through the distribution pipe for a 7.6 m (25 ft) long pipe. The remaining 81% of energy input is used to heat water. In a gas water heater, conduction losses through jacket and distribution pipe are 12% and 3%, respectively; and 33% is lost up the flue (due to main burner and pilot light operation). Only 52% of energy input to a gas water heater is used to heat water. Several energy-saving design changes are examined using the energy model. Changes for both electric and gas water heaters are: increase jacket insulation thickness, reduce jacket insulation thermal conductivity, reduce thermostat setting, and add insulation to the distribution line. Application of all these changes to an electric water heater would reduce electricity use 17% and increase initial cost 27%. Additional changes examined for gas water heaters are: reduce pilot rate, eliminate pilot and add electric ignitor and flue closure, and reduce excess air for combustion by increasing flue baffling. Implementing all these changes to a gas water heater (except addition of electric ignitor) would reduce gas use 27% and increase initial cost 26%. These results show that there are large opportunities for reducing water heater energy use with only small initial cost increases.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A detailed computer model is developed to calculate energy flows for residential electric and gas water heaters. Model equations are derived from applications of the first law of thermodynamics, analysis of manufacturers' literature, and related studies. The model is used to evaluate the energy (and associated initial cost) impacts of alternative designs to reduce water heater fuel use. Model results show that the largest heat loss in an electric water heater is conduction through jacket walls (14% of energy input). An additional 5% is lost through the distribution pipe for a 7.6 m (25 ft) long pipe. The remaining 81% of energy input is used to heat water. In a gas water heater, conduction losses through jacket and distribution pipe are 12% and 3%, respectively; and 33% is lost up the flue (due to main burner and pilot light operation). Only 52% of energy input to a gas water heater is used to heat water. Several energy-saving design changes are examined using the energy model. Changes for both electric and gas water heaters are: increase jacket insulation thickness, reduce jacket insulation thermal conductivity, reduce thermostat setting, and add insulation to the distribution line. Application of all these changes to an electric water heater would reduce electricity use 17% and increase initial cost 27%. Additional changes examined for gas water heaters are: reduce pilot rate, eliminate pilot and add electric ignitor and flue closure, and reduce excess air for combustion by increasing flue baffling. Implementing all these changes to a gas water heater (except addition of electric ignitor) would reduce gas use 27% and increase initial cost 26%. These results show that there are large opportunities for reducing water heater energy use with only small initial cost increases.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A detailed computer model is developed to calculate energy flows for residential electric and gas water heaters. Model equations are derived from applications of the first law of thermodynamics, analysis of manufacturers' literature, and related studies. The model is used to evaluate the energy (and associated initial cost) impacts of alternative designs to reduce water heater fuel use. Model results show that the largest heat loss in an electric water heater is conduction through jacket walls (14% of energy input). An additional 5% is lost through the distribution pipe for a 7.6 m (25 ft) long pipe. The remaining 81% of energy input is used to heat water. In a gas water heater, conduction losses through jacket and distribution pipe are 12% and 3%, respectively; and 33% is lost up the flue (due to main burner and pilot light operation). Only 52% of energy input to a gas water heater is used to heat water. Several energy-saving design changes are examined using the energy model. Changes for both electric and gas water heaters are: increase jacket insulation thickness, reduce jacket insulation thermal conductivity, reduce thermostat setting, and add insulation to the distribution line. Application of all these changes to an electric water heater would reduce electricity use 17% and increase initial cost 27%. Additional changes examined for gas water heaters are: reduce pilot rate, eliminate pilot and add electric ignitor and flue closure, and reduce excess air for combustion by increasing flue baffling. Implementing all these changes to a gas water heater (except addition of electric ignitor) would reduce gas use 27% and increase initial cost 26%. These results show that there are large opportunities for reducing water heater energy use with only small initial cost increases.

Key concepts: Storage water heater, Flue gas, Thermostat, Storage heater, Environmental science, Electricity, Electric heating, Combustion

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Energy and cost analysis of residential water heaters — Research Paper | ScholarLens