1981OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Requires access

Making ready for the Clean Air Act

Daniel M. Harrison, Paul R. Portney

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Five areas of the Clean Air Act have become particularly controversial. The first four date from the 1970 amendments: EPA's national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS), its emissions standards for new or substantially modified sources, the system of local control of air polluters under state plans filed with EPA, and the automobile emissions standards. The fifth area, introduced in the 1977 amendments, is that of prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) in parts of the country where air quality exceeds the national standards. In considering them here, we briefly review the history of each provision, discuss the logic behind the approach that Congress or EPA took, identify the problems that have resulted, and suggest some ways of dealing with those problems. We then take up the larger issue of how economic balance and incentives can best be brought into air quality regulation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Five areas of the Clean Air Act have become particularly controversial. The first four date from the 1970 amendments: EPA's national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS), its emissions standards for new or substantially modified sources, the system of local control of air polluters under state plans filed with EPA, and the automobile emissions standards. The fifth area, introduced in the 1977 amendments, is that of prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) in parts of the country where air quality exceeds the national standards. In considering them here, we briefly review the history of each provision, discuss the logic behind the approach that Congress or EPA took, identify the problems that have resulted, and suggest some ways of dealing with those problems. We then take up the larger issue of how economic balance and incentives can best be brought into air quality regulation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Five areas of the Clean Air Act have become particularly controversial. The first four date from the 1970 amendments: EPA's national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS), its emissions standards for new or substantially modified sources, the system of local control of air polluters under state plans filed with EPA, and the automobile emissions standards. The fifth area, introduced in the 1977 amendments, is that of prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) in parts of the country where air quality exceeds the national standards. In considering them here, we briefly review the history of each provision, discuss the logic behind the approach that Congress or EPA took, identify the problems that have resulted, and suggest some ways of dealing with those problems. We then take up the larger issue of how economic balance and incentives can best be brought into air quality regulation.

Key concepts: Clean Air Act, National Ambient Air Quality Standards, Air quality index, Incentive, Business, Control (management), Quality (philosophy), Balance (ability)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Making ready for the Clean Air Act — Research Paper | ScholarLens