Endocervical curettage after cryotherapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Krebs Hb, Wheelock Jb
Abstract
Krebs Hb, Wheelock Jb
Abstract
Two hundred forty-five patients were studied prospectively to determine the value of endocervical curettage (ECC) in the follow-up of patients having undergone cryotherapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Patients at high risk of treatment failure were divided into three groups: (I) CIN grade 3 lesions confined strictly to the ectocervix (86 patients), (II) CIN grade 1-3 lesions involving the endocervix to a depth of up to 5 mm and a negative ECC prior to cryotherapy (64 patients), and (III) CIN grade 1-3 lesions confined to the ectocervix or extending into the endocervix to a depth of up to 5 mm and a positive ECC (27 patients). A fourth group, 68 patients with CIN grade 1 and 2 lesions confined to the ectocervix, was considered to be at low risk of treatment failure and served as controls. All the patients had satisfactory colposcopy. ECC was performed at 6 and 12 months after cryotherapy. Recurrent or persistent CIN was diagnosed in 19 of 245 patients (8%) and was found in group I (6 of 86, or 8%), II (6 of 64, or 9%), III (3 of 27, or 11%) and IV (4 of 68, or 6%). The rates of treatment failure did not differ significantly between the various groups (p greater than 0.1). ECC was positive in 4 of 19 (21%) of the cryotherapy failures (group I, 1 of 6; II, 2 of 6; III, 1 of 3; IV, 0 of 4). In two cases of a positive follow-up ECC, cervical cytology was also positive.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Two hundred forty-five patients were studied prospectively to determine the value of endocervical curettage (ECC) in the follow-up of patients having undergone cryotherapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Patients at high risk of treatment failure were divided into three groups: (I) CIN grade 3 lesions confined strictly to the ectocervix (86 patients), (II) CIN grade 1-3 lesions involving the endocervix to a depth of up to 5 mm and a negative ECC prior to cryotherapy (64 patients), and (III) CIN grade 1-3 lesions confined to the ectocervix or extending into the endocervix to a depth of up to 5 mm and a positive ECC (27 patients). A fourth group, 68 patients with CIN grade 1 and 2 lesions confined to the ectocervix, was considered to be at low risk of treatment failure and served as controls. All the patients had satisfactory colposcopy. ECC was performed at 6 and 12 months after cryotherapy. Recurrent or persistent CIN was diagnosed in 19 of 245 patients (8%) and was found in group I (6 of 86, or 8%), II (6 of 64, or 9%), III (3 of 27, or 11%) and IV (4 of 68, or 6%). The rates of treatment failure did not differ significantly between the various groups (p greater than 0.1). ECC was positive in 4 of 19 (21%) of the cryotherapy failures (group I, 1 of 6; II, 2 of 6; III, 1 of 3; IV, 0 of 4). In two cases of a positive follow-up ECC, cervical cytology was also positive.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Key concepts: Cryotherapy, Medicine, Endocervical curettage, Endocervix, Colposcopy, Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, Surgery, Curettage