2014European Scientific Journal ESJOpen access

IS THE LIMITED LIABILITY DOCTRINE APPLICABLE TO COMPANY DIRECTORS

Virginijus Bitė, Gintarė Jakuntavičiūtė

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

At all times the majority of directors, which desired to properly perform and develop activities on behalf of a company in a competitive market, were raising relevant questions on how to control a company aiming to guarantee and ensure its financial viability and competitiveness, what is the line between the freedom of decision-making and personal liability therefore, are the directors equally as the shareholders protected under the limited liability doctrine? The prevailing opinion is that principle of limited liability protects shareholders and only shareholders from liability. Therefore, in this study the authors explore this premise from the perspective of the doctrinal implications of immunising directors from personal liability for their actions, when managing company’s affairs. The authors’ principal conclusions are that the limited liability doctrine should be applied not only to the shareholders, but also in respect of the directors. Such legal protection from the liability could be withdrawn, when a director commits illegal acts that cause damages to a company or to creditors thereof. In respect of creditors the liability of such director shall still be considered subsidiary, whereas a direct liability of the director may only arise against a company until its liquidation and only after the completion of liquidation proceedings – against the creditors whose claims remained unsatisfied.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

At all times the majority of directors, which desired to properly perform and develop activities on behalf of a company in a competitive market, were raising relevant questions on how to control a company aiming to guarantee and ensure its financial viability and competitiveness, what is the line between the freedom of decision-making and personal liability therefore, are the directors equally as the shareholders protected under the limited liability doctrine? The prevailing opinion is that principle of limited liability protects shareholders and only shareholders from liability. Therefore, in this study the authors explore this premise from the perspective of the doctrinal implications of immunising directors from personal liability for their actions, when managing company’s affairs. The authors’ principal conclusions are that the limited liability doctrine should be applied not only to the shareholders, but also in respect of the directors. Such legal protection from the liability could be withdrawn, when a director commits illegal acts that cause damages to a company or to creditors thereof. In respect of creditors the liability of such director shall still be considered subsidiary, whereas a direct liability of the director may only arise against a company until its liquidation and only after the completion of liquidation proceedings – against the creditors whose claims remained unsatisfied.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

At all times the majority of directors, which desired to properly perform and develop activities on behalf of a company in a competitive market, were raising relevant questions on how to control a company aiming to guarantee and ensure its financial viability and competitiveness, what is the line between the freedom of decision-making and personal liability therefore, are the directors equally as the shareholders protected under the limited liability doctrine? The prevailing opinion is that principle of limited liability protects shareholders and only shareholders from liability. Therefore, in this study the authors explore this premise from the perspective of the doctrinal implications of immunising directors from personal liability for their actions, when managing company’s affairs. The authors’ principal conclusions are that the limited liability doctrine should be applied not only to the shareholders, but also in respect of the directors. Such legal protection from the liability could be withdrawn, when a director commits illegal acts that cause damages to a company or to creditors thereof. In respect of creditors the liability of such director shall still be considered subsidiary, whereas a direct liability of the director may only arise against a company until its liquidation and only after the completion of liquidation proceedings – against the creditors whose claims remained unsatisfied.

Key concepts: Shareholder, Limited liability, Liability, Limited liability partnership, Business, Doctrine, Creditor, Premise

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
IS THE LIMITED LIABILITY DOCTRINE APPLICABLE TO COMPANY DIRECTORS — Research Paper | ScholarLens