1991Regional Anesthesia The Journal of Neural Blockade in Obstetrics Surgery & Pain ControlRequires access

Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block Aided by a Nerve Stimulator: A Reliable Technique for Foot and Ankle Surgery

François Singelyn, J. M. Gouverneur, B Gribomont

Open publisher page 96 citations

Abstract

The reliability of popliteal sciatic nerve blocks was prospectively assessed in 625 blocks performed in 507 patients. The sciatic nerve was approached at the apex of the popliteal fossa, in the midline, with an insulated needle connected to a peripheral nerve stimulator partially designed by one of the authors. When needed, an inguinal paravascular femoral nerve block was also performed. The drugs used were 1% mepivacaine or 0.5% bupivacaine with or without 1:200,000 epinephrine. The sciatic and femoral nerves were blocked with 30 ml and 10 ml of local anesthetic, respectively. The block was sufficient to provide surgical anesthesia in 92%; supplemental analgesia was necessary in 5% and general anesthesia was required in 3% of the cases. Discomfort associated with the block procedure was found to be minimal by 89% of the patients, moderate by 9% and severe by 2%. Overall satisfaction with perioperative analgesia was evaluated by 466 patients: 444 (95%) were completely satisfied, 20 (4%) expressed moderate reservations and two (1%) expressed major reservations. The authors conclude that the technique is a safe and reliable alternative to more common forms of anesthesia for surgery below the knee. They attribute the great success rate to a high popliteal approach, the use of insulated needles, a discriminating mode of nerve stimulation and the systematic search for optimal response to needle stimulation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The reliability of popliteal sciatic nerve blocks was prospectively assessed in 625 blocks performed in 507 patients. The sciatic nerve was approached at the apex of the popliteal fossa, in the midline, with an insulated needle connected to a peripheral nerve stimulator partially designed by one of the authors. When needed, an inguinal paravascular femoral nerve block was also performed. The drugs used were 1% mepivacaine or 0.5% bupivacaine with or without 1:200,000 epinephrine. The sciatic and femoral nerves were blocked with 30 ml and 10 ml of local anesthetic, respectively. The block was sufficient to provide surgical anesthesia in 92%; supplemental analgesia was necessary in 5% and general anesthesia was required in 3% of the cases. Discomfort associated with the block procedure was found to be minimal by 89% of the patients, moderate by 9% and severe by 2%. Overall satisfaction with perioperative analgesia was evaluated by 466 patients: 444 (95%) were completely satisfied, 20 (4%) expressed moderate reservations and two (1%) expressed major reservations. The authors conclude that the technique is a safe and reliable alternative to more common forms of anesthesia for surgery below the knee. They attribute the great success rate to a high popliteal approach, the use of insulated needles, a discriminating mode of nerve stimulation and the systematic search for optimal response to needle stimulation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 96 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The reliability of popliteal sciatic nerve blocks was prospectively assessed in 625 blocks performed in 507 patients. The sciatic nerve was approached at the apex of the popliteal fossa, in the midline, with an insulated needle connected to a peripheral nerve stimulator partially designed by one of the authors. When needed, an inguinal paravascular femoral nerve block was also performed. The drugs used were 1% mepivacaine or 0.5% bupivacaine with or without 1:200,000 epinephrine. The sciatic and femoral nerves were blocked with 30 ml and 10 ml of local anesthetic, respectively. The block was sufficient to provide surgical anesthesia in 92%; supplemental analgesia was necessary in 5% and general anesthesia was required in 3% of the cases. Discomfort associated with the block procedure was found to be minimal by 89% of the patients, moderate by 9% and severe by 2%. Overall satisfaction with perioperative analgesia was evaluated by 466 patients: 444 (95%) were completely satisfied, 20 (4%) expressed moderate reservations and two (1%) expressed major reservations. The authors conclude that the technique is a safe and reliable alternative to more common forms of anesthesia for surgery below the knee. They attribute the great success rate to a high popliteal approach, the use of insulated needles, a discriminating mode of nerve stimulation and the systematic search for optimal response to needle stimulation.

Key concepts: Mepivacaine, Popliteal fossa, Medicine, Sciatic nerve, Anesthesia, Foot and ankle surgery, Nerve block, Ankle

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block Aided by a Nerve Stimulator: A Reliable Technique for Foot and Ankle Surgery — Research Paper | ScholarLens