1995•Oil & gas journal/Oil and gas journalRequires access

Analysis shows magnitude of Z-factor error

K. A. Fattah

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

After four decades, the Standing-Katz Z-factor chart is still widely used as a practical source for obtaining natural gas compressibility factors. The chart is based on experimental data on gas mixtures at pressures up to 10,000 psia. With the advent of computers, however, the need arose to find a convenient technique for calculating Z-factors. Eight popular methods for obtaining the Z-factor for natural gas are compared to the Standing-Katz compressibility chart. Inaccurate Z-factors can lead to erratic gas reserves estimates and produced volume metering errors. Error magnitudes associated with the eight correlations are graphed in 2 figures. To guide designers and experimenters in selecting the best methods for their particular applications, a recommended range of applicability is provided for each method to ensure acceptable compressibility factor values. Method accuracy has been determined based on 5,940 original data points for pseudoreduced temperatures (T{sub r}) and pseudoreduced pressures (P{sub r}) in the ranges of 1.05 {le} T{sub r} {le} 3.0 and 0.2 {le} P{sub r} {le} respectively.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

After four decades, the Standing-Katz Z-factor chart is still widely used as a practical source for obtaining natural gas compressibility factors. The chart is based on experimental data on gas mixtures at pressures up to 10,000 psia. With the advent of computers, however, the need arose to find a convenient technique for calculating Z-factors. Eight popular methods for obtaining the Z-factor for natural gas are compared to the Standing-Katz compressibility chart. Inaccurate Z-factors can lead to erratic gas reserves estimates and produced volume metering errors. Error magnitudes associated with the eight correlations are graphed in 2 figures. To guide designers and experimenters in selecting the best methods for their particular applications, a recommended range of applicability is provided for each method to ensure acceptable compressibility factor values. Method accuracy has been determined based on 5,940 original data points for pseudoreduced temperatures (T{sub r}) and pseudoreduced pressures (P{sub r}) in the ranges of 1.05 {le} T{sub r} {le} 3.0 and 0.2 {le} P{sub r} {le} respectively.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

After four decades, the Standing-Katz Z-factor chart is still widely used as a practical source for obtaining natural gas compressibility factors. The chart is based on experimental data on gas mixtures at pressures up to 10,000 psia. With the advent of computers, however, the need arose to find a convenient technique for calculating Z-factors. Eight popular methods for obtaining the Z-factor for natural gas are compared to the Standing-Katz compressibility chart. Inaccurate Z-factors can lead to erratic gas reserves estimates and produced volume metering errors. Error magnitudes associated with the eight correlations are graphed in 2 figures. To guide designers and experimenters in selecting the best methods for their particular applications, a recommended range of applicability is provided for each method to ensure acceptable compressibility factor values. Method accuracy has been determined based on 5,940 original data points for pseudoreduced temperatures (T{sub r}) and pseudoreduced pressures (P{sub r}) in the ranges of 1.05 {le} T{sub r} {le} 3.0 and 0.2 {le} P{sub r} {le} respectively.

Key concepts: Chart, Compressibility factor, Metering mode, Natural gas, Range (aeronautics), Compressibility, Volume (thermodynamics), Statistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analysis shows magnitude of Z-factor error — Research Paper | ScholarLens