1995RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsRequires access

Involuntary Unemployment, from Keynes to the New Keynesians

Michel De Vroey

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The objective of the present study is to reflect upon the evolution of Keynesian theory, by recounting the evolution of ideas regarding the theoretical acceptability of the involuntary unemployment concept. Its first part presents my own reconstruction of the theoretical project Keynes set himself forth in his General Theory. In the second part, I look at the fundamental difficulty encountered with this project. In the third part I argue that the involuntary unemployment result is obtained neither in the General Theory, nor in the standard IS-LM models. The fourth part is devoted to a discussion of Patinkin and Clower's acceptation of involuntary unemployment as well as Barro and Grossman's synthesis of their views. In the fifth part, I evaluate the anti-Keynsian offensive spearheaded by Friedman and Lucas. In the sixth part, I look at the significance of involuntary unemployment in some 'new Keynesian' models.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The objective of the present study is to reflect upon the evolution of Keynesian theory, by recounting the evolution of ideas regarding the theoretical acceptability of the involuntary unemployment concept. Its first part presents my own reconstruction of the theoretical project Keynes set himself forth in his General Theory. In the second part, I look at the fundamental difficulty encountered with this project. In the third part I argue that the involuntary unemployment result is obtained neither in the General Theory, nor in the standard IS-LM models. The fourth part is devoted to a discussion of Patinkin and Clower's acceptation of involuntary unemployment as well as Barro and Grossman's synthesis of their views. In the fifth part, I evaluate the anti-Keynsian offensive spearheaded by Friedman and Lucas. In the sixth part, I look at the significance of involuntary unemployment in some 'new Keynesian' models.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The objective of the present study is to reflect upon the evolution of Keynesian theory, by recounting the evolution of ideas regarding the theoretical acceptability of the involuntary unemployment concept. Its first part presents my own reconstruction of the theoretical project Keynes set himself forth in his General Theory. In the second part, I look at the fundamental difficulty encountered with this project. In the third part I argue that the involuntary unemployment result is obtained neither in the General Theory, nor in the standard IS-LM models. The fourth part is devoted to a discussion of Patinkin and Clower's acceptation of involuntary unemployment as well as Barro and Grossman's synthesis of their views. In the fifth part, I evaluate the anti-Keynsian offensive spearheaded by Friedman and Lucas. In the sixth part, I look at the significance of involuntary unemployment in some 'new Keynesian' models.

Key concepts: Involuntary unemployment, Unemployment, Keynesian economics, Economics, Full employment, Grossman, General theory, Set (abstract data type)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Involuntary Unemployment, from Keynes to the New Keynesians — Research Paper | ScholarLens