2009Tunnels & tunnellingRequires access

Cutting Risks with Inspections

Mohammad Jafari, F.G. Bernardeau, Michael Gilbert

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This article describes an engineering firm’s approach to repairing Heroes Tunnel, which was constructed in 1949 and is the only highway rock tunnel in Connecticut. The 0.4-kilometer long tunnel consists of two 8.5-meter wide and 5.8-meter high tubes, which intercept a significant amount of underground water. As the tunnel has aged, its safety has become compromised by the water, particularly during winter when icicles form and drop on the tunnel floor causing icy patches. The article describes in detail the method of inspection of the tunnel that was undertaken by the firm in order to mitigate risk. Some considerations included a lack of understanding of the original design and construction criteria, a lack of geotechnical details, and no as-built record of construction. In addition, the article notes that much has changed in the intervening 60 years in terms of the technology of ventilation, drainage, and lighting, all of which would add restrictions in increased cost to remedial measures.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article describes an engineering firm’s approach to repairing Heroes Tunnel, which was constructed in 1949 and is the only highway rock tunnel in Connecticut. The 0.4-kilometer long tunnel consists of two 8.5-meter wide and 5.8-meter high tubes, which intercept a significant amount of underground water. As the tunnel has aged, its safety has become compromised by the water, particularly during winter when icicles form and drop on the tunnel floor causing icy patches. The article describes in detail the method of inspection of the tunnel that was undertaken by the firm in order to mitigate risk. Some considerations included a lack of understanding of the original design and construction criteria, a lack of geotechnical details, and no as-built record of construction. In addition, the article notes that much has changed in the intervening 60 years in terms of the technology of ventilation, drainage, and lighting, all of which would add restrictions in increased cost to remedial measures.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article describes an engineering firm’s approach to repairing Heroes Tunnel, which was constructed in 1949 and is the only highway rock tunnel in Connecticut. The 0.4-kilometer long tunnel consists of two 8.5-meter wide and 5.8-meter high tubes, which intercept a significant amount of underground water. As the tunnel has aged, its safety has become compromised by the water, particularly during winter when icicles form and drop on the tunnel floor causing icy patches. The article describes in detail the method of inspection of the tunnel that was undertaken by the firm in order to mitigate risk. Some considerations included a lack of understanding of the original design and construction criteria, a lack of geotechnical details, and no as-built record of construction. In addition, the article notes that much has changed in the intervening 60 years in terms of the technology of ventilation, drainage, and lighting, all of which would add restrictions in increased cost to remedial measures.

Key concepts: Engineering, Civil engineering, Metre, Drainage, Remedial education, Tunnel construction, Forensic engineering, Geotechnical engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cutting Risks with Inspections — Research Paper | ScholarLens