Fusion of Information Retrieval Engines (FIRE)
S.Alaoui Mounir, Nazli Goharian, Michael S. Mahoney, Abdel-Badeeh M. Salem, Ophir Frieder
Abstract
S.Alaoui Mounir, Nazli Goharian, Michael S. Mahoney, Abdel-Badeeh M. Salem, Ophir Frieder
Abstract
We examine the feasibility of fusing the outputs of multiple text retrieval engines to improve accuracy. We tested three Web-based search engines (Excite for Web Servers, Infoseek's Ultraseek Server, and Sony Search Engine) over a 74,520 document collection (TREC Wall Street Journal articles from 1990-92) with a set of 125 natural-language queries with relevance judgements (TREC topics 51-175). We show that a weighted combination of scores produces higher precision over the top 5, 105 20, and 30 documents than any single engine over the same data set. We also compare favorably against the state-of-the-art heuristics in merging search engines. Our results suggest that fusing the results from the most dissimilar engines (those with the least overlap in the retrieved sets) is a more effective strategy than simply weighting the best engines more heavily. Keywords: Information Fusion, Distributed Applications, Web Search Engines, Information Retrieval, TREC.
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We examine the feasibility of fusing the outputs of multiple text retrieval engines to improve accuracy. We tested three Web-based search engines (Excite for Web Servers, Infoseek's Ultraseek Server, and Sony Search Engine) over a 74,520 document collection (TREC Wall Street Journal articles from 1990-92) with a set of 125 natural-language queries with relevance judgements (TREC topics 51-175). We show that a weighted combination of scores produces higher precision over the top 5, 105 20, and 30 documents than any single engine over the same data set. We also compare favorably against the state-of-the-art heuristics in merging search engines. Our results suggest that fusing the results from the most dissimilar engines (those with the least overlap in the retrieved sets) is a more effective strategy than simply weighting the best engines more heavily. Keywords: Information Fusion, Distributed Applications, Web Search Engines, Information Retrieval, TREC.
Key concepts: Information retrieval, Search engine, Computer science, Relevance (law), Set (abstract data type), Weighting, Metasearch engine, Web search engine