2002Unpublished venueRequires access

Fusion of Information Retrieval Engines (FIRE)

S.Alaoui Mounir, Nazli Goharian, Michael S. Mahoney, Abdel-Badeeh M. Salem, Ophir Frieder

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

We examine the feasibility of fusing the outputs of multiple text retrieval engines to improve accuracy. We tested three Web-based search engines (Excite for Web Servers, Infoseek's Ultraseek Server, and Sony Search Engine) over a 74,520 document collection (TREC Wall Street Journal articles from 1990-92) with a set of 125 natural-language queries with relevance judgements (TREC topics 51-175). We show that a weighted combination of scores produces higher precision over the top 5, 105 20, and 30 documents than any single engine over the same data set. We also compare favorably against the state-of-the-art heuristics in merging search engines. Our results suggest that fusing the results from the most dissimilar engines (those with the least overlap in the retrieved sets) is a more effective strategy than simply weighting the best engines more heavily. Keywords: Information Fusion, Distributed Applications, Web Search Engines, Information Retrieval, TREC.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We examine the feasibility of fusing the outputs of multiple text retrieval engines to improve accuracy. We tested three Web-based search engines (Excite for Web Servers, Infoseek's Ultraseek Server, and Sony Search Engine) over a 74,520 document collection (TREC Wall Street Journal articles from 1990-92) with a set of 125 natural-language queries with relevance judgements (TREC topics 51-175). We show that a weighted combination of scores produces higher precision over the top 5, 105 20, and 30 documents than any single engine over the same data set. We also compare favorably against the state-of-the-art heuristics in merging search engines. Our results suggest that fusing the results from the most dissimilar engines (those with the least overlap in the retrieved sets) is a more effective strategy than simply weighting the best engines more heavily. Keywords: Information Fusion, Distributed Applications, Web Search Engines, Information Retrieval, TREC.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We examine the feasibility of fusing the outputs of multiple text retrieval engines to improve accuracy. We tested three Web-based search engines (Excite for Web Servers, Infoseek's Ultraseek Server, and Sony Search Engine) over a 74,520 document collection (TREC Wall Street Journal articles from 1990-92) with a set of 125 natural-language queries with relevance judgements (TREC topics 51-175). We show that a weighted combination of scores produces higher precision over the top 5, 105 20, and 30 documents than any single engine over the same data set. We also compare favorably against the state-of-the-art heuristics in merging search engines. Our results suggest that fusing the results from the most dissimilar engines (those with the least overlap in the retrieved sets) is a more effective strategy than simply weighting the best engines more heavily. Keywords: Information Fusion, Distributed Applications, Web Search Engines, Information Retrieval, TREC.

Key concepts: Information retrieval, Search engine, Computer science, Relevance (law), Set (abstract data type), Weighting, Metasearch engine, Web search engine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fusion of Information Retrieval Engines (FIRE) — Research Paper | ScholarLens