1983•Journal of BacteriologyOpen access

Comparison of Ti plasmids from three different biotypes of Agrobacterium tumefaciens isolated from grapevines

Vic C. Knauf, C. G. Panagopoulos, Eugene W. Nester

Open full text 24 citations

Abstract

Twenty-six plasmids from grapevine isolates of Agrobacterium tumefaciens were analyzed by SmaI fingerprinting and by hybridization of nick-translated DNA to DNA of another plasmid. These experiments established that octopine Ti plasmids are not highly conserved, although octopine Ti plasmids from biotype 1 A. tumefaciens strains appeared to be very similar. Octopine Ti plasmids from biotype 3 strains are more variable in terms of host range and SmaI fingerprints, but share extensive DNA homology. Fingerprints of nopaline Ti plasmids from strains of a given biotype resemble each other but not fingerprints of Ti plasmids from strains of the other two biotypes. The wide host range octopine Ti plasmid from the biotype 3 strain Ag86 shares more DNA homology with narrow host range Ti plasmids, nopaline Ti plasmids, and octopine catabolism plasmids than with the wide host range octopine Ti plasmid from biotype 1 strain 20/1. pTiAg86 does share homology with the portion of pTi20/1 integrated and expressed in plant tumor cells. Since all wide host range Ti plasmids studied contain these sequences, we suggest that natural selection for a wide host range resulted in the presence of the common sequences in distantly related plasmids. The lack of homology between this "common DNA" and limited host range Ti plasmids shows that the DNA sequences per se are not required for tumorigenesis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Twenty-six plasmids from grapevine isolates of Agrobacterium tumefaciens were analyzed by SmaI fingerprinting and by hybridization of nick-translated DNA to DNA of another plasmid. These experiments established that octopine Ti plasmids are not highly conserved, although octopine Ti plasmids from biotype 1 A. tumefaciens strains appeared to be very similar. Octopine Ti plasmids from biotype 3 strains are more variable in terms of host range and SmaI fingerprints, but share extensive DNA homology. Fingerprints of nopaline Ti plasmids from strains of a given biotype resemble each other but not fingerprints of Ti plasmids from strains of the other two biotypes. The wide host range octopine Ti plasmid from the biotype 3 strain Ag86 shares more DNA homology with narrow host range Ti plasmids, nopaline Ti plasmids, and octopine catabolism plasmids than with the wide host range octopine Ti plasmid from biotype 1 strain 20/1. pTiAg86 does share homology with the portion of pTi20/1 integrated and expressed in plant tumor cells. Since all wide host range Ti plasmids studied contain these sequences, we suggest that natural selection for a wide host range resulted in the presence of the common sequences in distantly related plasmids. The lack of homology between this "common DNA" and limited host range Ti plasmids shows that the DNA sequences per se are not required for tumorigenesis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Twenty-six plasmids from grapevine isolates of Agrobacterium tumefaciens were analyzed by SmaI fingerprinting and by hybridization of nick-translated DNA to DNA of another plasmid. These experiments established that octopine Ti plasmids are not highly conserved, although octopine Ti plasmids from biotype 1 A. tumefaciens strains appeared to be very similar. Octopine Ti plasmids from biotype 3 strains are more variable in terms of host range and SmaI fingerprints, but share extensive DNA homology. Fingerprints of nopaline Ti plasmids from strains of a given biotype resemble each other but not fingerprints of Ti plasmids from strains of the other two biotypes. The wide host range octopine Ti plasmid from the biotype 3 strain Ag86 shares more DNA homology with narrow host range Ti plasmids, nopaline Ti plasmids, and octopine catabolism plasmids than with the wide host range octopine Ti plasmid from biotype 1 strain 20/1. pTiAg86 does share homology with the portion of pTi20/1 integrated and expressed in plant tumor cells. Since all wide host range Ti plasmids studied contain these sequences, we suggest that natural selection for a wide host range resulted in the presence of the common sequences in distantly related plasmids. The lack of homology between this "common DNA" and limited host range Ti plasmids shows that the DNA sequences per se are not required for tumorigenesis.

Key concepts: Octopine, Plasmid, Ti plasmid, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Biology, T-DNA Binary system, Genetics, Homology (biology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Ti plasmids from three different biotypes of Agrobacterium tumefaciens isolated from grapevines — Research Paper | ScholarLens