Is there Ballistic Conductance Quantization in Real Life Metals Nanocontacts?
Nicolás García, Ming Bai, Yonghua Lü, M. Muñoz, A. P. Levanyuk
Abstract
Open-access reader
Nicolás García, Ming Bai, Yonghua Lü, M. Muñoz, A. P. Levanyuk
Abstract
Open-access reader
Theory and a vast set of experimental work in metals, since a century, appear to show that the mean free path of conduction electrons in a real metal is about the min (bulk mean free path, smallest transversal size of the metal), a result that was already proposed by J. J. Thomson in 1901. This establishes, as discussed in this work, serious difficulties to justify conductance quantization and ballistic transport in atomic/nanocontacts or nanoconstrictions of real life metals. The ohmic resistance of the leads proves to be as important as the ballistic one of the constriction.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Theory and a vast set of experimental work in metals, since a century, appear to show that the mean free path of conduction electrons in a real metal is about the min (bulk mean free path, smallest transversal size of the metal), a result that was already proposed by J. J. Thomson in 1901. This establishes, as discussed in this work, serious difficulties to justify conductance quantization and ballistic transport in atomic/nanocontacts or nanoconstrictions of real life metals. The ohmic resistance of the leads proves to be as important as the ballistic one of the constriction.
Key concepts: Mean free path, Ballistic conduction, Quantization (signal processing), Conductance, Condensed matter physics, Thermal conduction, Metal, Ohmic contact