Community Structure and Metacommunity Dynamics of Aquatic Invertebrates: a Test of the Neutral Theory
Michael M. Fuller, Tamara N. Romanuk, Jurek Kolasa
Abstract
Open-access reader
Michael M. Fuller, Tamara N. Romanuk, Jurek Kolasa
Abstract
Open-access reader
We used a metacommunity of 49 discrete communities of aquatic invertebrates to analyze the dynamical relationship between community and metacommunity species distributions as a test of the neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. At the community scale, observed variation in species richness and relative abundance was greater than predicted by neutral models, and revealed important differences among species in competitive ability and tolerance for predation. At the metacommunity scale, species with metacommunity proportions of less than 0.01% (38% of the observed metacommunity) were consistently more abundant than predicted by models. Our results are at variance with the neutral theory, and suggest that the use of an identical survival probability for all species in neutral models misrepresents substantial aspects of community assembly. Nevertheless, building and testing neutral models can provide valuable insights into the processes that determine species distributions.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We used a metacommunity of 49 discrete communities of aquatic invertebrates to analyze the dynamical relationship between community and metacommunity species distributions as a test of the neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. At the community scale, observed variation in species richness and relative abundance was greater than predicted by neutral models, and revealed important differences among species in competitive ability and tolerance for predation. At the metacommunity scale, species with metacommunity proportions of less than 0.01% (38% of the observed metacommunity) were consistently more abundant than predicted by models. Our results are at variance with the neutral theory, and suggest that the use of an identical survival probability for all species in neutral models misrepresents substantial aspects of community assembly. Nevertheless, building and testing neutral models can provide valuable insights into the processes that determine species distributions.
Key concepts: Metacommunity, Neutral theory of molecular evolution, Ecology, Invertebrate, Species richness, Community, Biodiversity, Biology