Myopic children show insufficient accommodative response to blur.
Jane Gwiazda, Frank Thorn, Jan Bauer, Richard Held
Abstract
Jane Gwiazda, Frank Thorn, Jan Bauer, Richard Held
Abstract
PURPOSE: The study was performed to establish the relationship between the slope of the accommodative response function and refractive error in children. METHODS: Using an autorefractor, accommodative responses were measured in children under the following conditions. The subjects wore their best subjective refraction to view targets (a 3 x 3 array of 20/100 letters) displayed at seven distances (4.0 to 0.25 m). They viewed letters placed at 4.0 m through a series of negative lenses and letters placed at 0.25 m through a series of positive lenses. RESULTS: Myopic children accommodate significantly less than emmetropic children for real targets at near distances. Compared with emmetropic subjects, myopic children use blur poorly to increase accommodation, as shown by shallow slopes of the accommodative response functions for negative lenses. However, with positive lenses, requiring relaxation of accommodation, there is no significant difference in slope between myopic and emmetropic children. CONCLUSIONS: Blur is not an effective stimulus for accommodation in myopic children.
OpenAlex reports 511 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
PURPOSE: The study was performed to establish the relationship between the slope of the accommodative response function and refractive error in children. METHODS: Using an autorefractor, accommodative responses were measured in children under the following conditions. The subjects wore their best subjective refraction to view targets (a 3 x 3 array of 20/100 letters) displayed at seven distances (4.0 to 0.25 m). They viewed letters placed at 4.0 m through a series of negative lenses and letters placed at 0.25 m through a series of positive lenses. RESULTS: Myopic children accommodate significantly less than emmetropic children for real targets at near distances. Compared with emmetropic subjects, myopic children use blur poorly to increase accommodation, as shown by shallow slopes of the accommodative response functions for negative lenses. However, with positive lenses, requiring relaxation of accommodation, there is no significant difference in slope between myopic and emmetropic children. CONCLUSIONS: Blur is not an effective stimulus for accommodation in myopic children.
Key concepts: Emmetropia, Autorefractor, Accommodation, Optometry, Refractive error, Psychology, Medicine, Optics