1975•Transportation Engineering Journal of ASCERequires access

Legal Liability and Highway Design and Maintenance

David Charles Keahi Oliver

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The threat of liability arising as a result of highway defects has commanded more respect for legal guidelines and dictums. The general rule of law is that a highway traveler using the highway is entitled to have that highway maintained in a reasonably safe condition. Warning signs must be placed where there are possible dangerous conditions; safety barriers are necessary where safe travel requires them; and lighting is required where a peculiar condition renders it necessary, traffic signals are generally under the rule of governmental capacity. Several recent cases which illustrate the progression of judicial thought to its present day sophistication in the area are thoroughly examined. Especially pertinent are the comments of the court in Martin versus State Highway Commission on the Federally inspired safety program.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The threat of liability arising as a result of highway defects has commanded more respect for legal guidelines and dictums. The general rule of law is that a highway traveler using the highway is entitled to have that highway maintained in a reasonably safe condition. Warning signs must be placed where there are possible dangerous conditions; safety barriers are necessary where safe travel requires them; and lighting is required where a peculiar condition renders it necessary, traffic signals are generally under the rule of governmental capacity. Several recent cases which illustrate the progression of judicial thought to its present day sophistication in the area are thoroughly examined. Especially pertinent are the comments of the court in Martin versus State Highway Commission on the Federally inspired safety program.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The threat of liability arising as a result of highway defects has commanded more respect for legal guidelines and dictums. The general rule of law is that a highway traveler using the highway is entitled to have that highway maintained in a reasonably safe condition. Warning signs must be placed where there are possible dangerous conditions; safety barriers are necessary where safe travel requires them; and lighting is required where a peculiar condition renders it necessary, traffic signals are generally under the rule of governmental capacity. Several recent cases which illustrate the progression of judicial thought to its present day sophistication in the area are thoroughly examined. Especially pertinent are the comments of the court in Martin versus State Highway Commission on the Federally inspired safety program.

Key concepts: Sophistication, Liability, State highway, Commission, Transport engineering, Highway engineering, Highway maintenance, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Legal Liability and Highway Design and Maintenance — Research Paper | ScholarLens