Evidence for negative charging of the lunar surface in shadow
J. S. Halekas, D. L. Mitchell, R. P. Lin, L. L. Hood, M. H. Acuña, A. B. Binder
Abstract
Open-access reader
J. S. Halekas, D. L. Mitchell, R. P. Lin, L. L. Hood, M. H. Acuña, A. B. Binder
Abstract
Open-access reader
Observations of electron distributions above the shadowed surface of the Moon show energy‐dependent loss cones which indicate reflection by both magnetic and electric fields. At the same time, low energy (≲100 eV) field aligned upward‐going electron beams are observed. Together, these observations imply average night‐side potential differences between the surface and the Lunar Prospector (LP) spacecraft of ∼−35 V. The lunar surface may be at an even higher negative potential relative to the ambient plasma, since LP will likely also charge negative. The potential difference is consistent with simple current balance models which include secondary emission. No clear dependence is found on surface terrane type and age, or on ambient electron density and temperature. Instead, the potential difference is found to depend strongly on the angle from the subsolar point and the angle between the magnetic field and the normal to the lunar surface.
OpenAlex reports 125 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Observations of electron distributions above the shadowed surface of the Moon show energy‐dependent loss cones which indicate reflection by both magnetic and electric fields. At the same time, low energy (≲100 eV) field aligned upward‐going electron beams are observed. Together, these observations imply average night‐side potential differences between the surface and the Lunar Prospector (LP) spacecraft of ∼−35 V. The lunar surface may be at an even higher negative potential relative to the ambient plasma, since LP will likely also charge negative. The potential difference is consistent with simple current balance models which include secondary emission. No clear dependence is found on surface terrane type and age, or on ambient electron density and temperature. Instead, the potential difference is found to depend strongly on the angle from the subsolar point and the angle between the magnetic field and the normal to the lunar surface.
Key concepts: Far side of the Moon, Electron, Spacecraft, Magnetic field, Electric field, Physics, Plasma, Electron density