2002Geophysical Research LettersOpen access

Evidence for negative charging of the lunar surface in shadow

J. S. Halekas, D. L. Mitchell, R. P. Lin, L. L. Hood, M. H. Acuña, A. B. Binder

Open full text 125 citations

Abstract

Observations of electron distributions above the shadowed surface of the Moon show energy‐dependent loss cones which indicate reflection by both magnetic and electric fields. At the same time, low energy (≲100 eV) field aligned upward‐going electron beams are observed. Together, these observations imply average night‐side potential differences between the surface and the Lunar Prospector (LP) spacecraft of ∼−35 V. The lunar surface may be at an even higher negative potential relative to the ambient plasma, since LP will likely also charge negative. The potential difference is consistent with simple current balance models which include secondary emission. No clear dependence is found on surface terrane type and age, or on ambient electron density and temperature. Instead, the potential difference is found to depend strongly on the angle from the subsolar point and the angle between the magnetic field and the normal to the lunar surface.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Observations of electron distributions above the shadowed surface of the Moon show energy‐dependent loss cones which indicate reflection by both magnetic and electric fields. At the same time, low energy (≲100 eV) field aligned upward‐going electron beams are observed. Together, these observations imply average night‐side potential differences between the surface and the Lunar Prospector (LP) spacecraft of ∼−35 V. The lunar surface may be at an even higher negative potential relative to the ambient plasma, since LP will likely also charge negative. The potential difference is consistent with simple current balance models which include secondary emission. No clear dependence is found on surface terrane type and age, or on ambient electron density and temperature. Instead, the potential difference is found to depend strongly on the angle from the subsolar point and the angle between the magnetic field and the normal to the lunar surface.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 125 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Observations of electron distributions above the shadowed surface of the Moon show energy‐dependent loss cones which indicate reflection by both magnetic and electric fields. At the same time, low energy (≲100 eV) field aligned upward‐going electron beams are observed. Together, these observations imply average night‐side potential differences between the surface and the Lunar Prospector (LP) spacecraft of ∼−35 V. The lunar surface may be at an even higher negative potential relative to the ambient plasma, since LP will likely also charge negative. The potential difference is consistent with simple current balance models which include secondary emission. No clear dependence is found on surface terrane type and age, or on ambient electron density and temperature. Instead, the potential difference is found to depend strongly on the angle from the subsolar point and the angle between the magnetic field and the normal to the lunar surface.

Key concepts: Far side of the Moon, Electron, Spacecraft, Magnetic field, Electric field, Physics, Plasma, Electron density

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evidence for negative charging of the lunar surface in shadow — Research Paper | ScholarLens