1998Unpublished venueRequires access

Peace Operations: A Mission Essential Task?

Gregory D. Reilly

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The number of peace operations US Army forces engage in will likely increase, rather than decrease in the future. Peace operations are nothing new to the military. What is new, however, is the number, pace, scope and complexity of these operations. There is growing concern that the current operations tempo of the US Army is eroding the combat readiness of forces to fight wartime contingencies. On the other hand, as units focus training on wartime contingencies, how prepared are they to conduct peace operations? This monograph explores the tasks associated with conducting peace operations to determine if infantry forces should include peace operations in the development of their mission essential task list. An historical overview of three recent peace operations (Restore Hope, Provide Comfort, and Uphold Democracy) enabled a classification of tasks that were performed during these operations. The tasks conducted during these operations were compared to tasks infantry units conduct during combat operations to determine the extent they deviated. The analysis concluded that tasks associated with conducting peace operations were predominately tactical tasks. The findings of this monograph suggest that infantry forces should not include peace operations in the development of their mission essential task list. Infantry units that are well disciplined, trained, and led have the flexibility to rapidly transition to peace operations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The number of peace operations US Army forces engage in will likely increase, rather than decrease in the future. Peace operations are nothing new to the military. What is new, however, is the number, pace, scope and complexity of these operations. There is growing concern that the current operations tempo of the US Army is eroding the combat readiness of forces to fight wartime contingencies. On the other hand, as units focus training on wartime contingencies, how prepared are they to conduct peace operations? This monograph explores the tasks associated with conducting peace operations to determine if infantry forces should include peace operations in the development of their mission essential task list. An historical overview of three recent peace operations (Restore Hope, Provide Comfort, and Uphold Democracy) enabled a classification of tasks that were performed during these operations. The tasks conducted during these operations were compared to tasks infantry units conduct during combat operations to determine the extent they deviated. The analysis concluded that tasks associated with conducting peace operations were predominately tactical tasks. The findings of this monograph suggest that infantry forces should not include peace operations in the development of their mission essential task list. Infantry units that are well disciplined, trained, and led have the flexibility to rapidly transition to peace operations.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The number of peace operations US Army forces engage in will likely increase, rather than decrease in the future. Peace operations are nothing new to the military. What is new, however, is the number, pace, scope and complexity of these operations. There is growing concern that the current operations tempo of the US Army is eroding the combat readiness of forces to fight wartime contingencies. On the other hand, as units focus training on wartime contingencies, how prepared are they to conduct peace operations? This monograph explores the tasks associated with conducting peace operations to determine if infantry forces should include peace operations in the development of their mission essential task list. An historical overview of three recent peace operations (Restore Hope, Provide Comfort, and Uphold Democracy) enabled a classification of tasks that were performed during these operations. The tasks conducted during these operations were compared to tasks infantry units conduct during combat operations to determine the extent they deviated. The analysis concluded that tasks associated with conducting peace operations were predominately tactical tasks. The findings of this monograph suggest that infantry forces should not include peace operations in the development of their mission essential task list. Infantry units that are well disciplined, trained, and led have the flexibility to rapidly transition to peace operations.

Key concepts: Task (project management), Aeronautics, Computer science, Geography, Engineering, Systems engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Peace Operations: A Mission Essential Task? — Research Paper | ScholarLens