1977•Unpublished venueOpen access

Residential energy use to the Year 2000: a regional analysis

Eric Hirst, James B. Kurish

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

A previous ORNL report (ORNL/CON-13) evaluates the national energy and direct economic effects of implementing various residential energy conservation programs. This report evaluates the effects of these programs in each of the ten Federal regions. The programs considered are those proposed in the National Energy Plan: appliance efficiency targets, thermal standards for construction of new residences, and weatherization of existing housing units. Implementation of these programs might cut cumulative (1977-2000) national residential energy use by 41 QBtu. Relative energy savings are highest in Regions 7 and 8 (11 and 10% respectively, of their baselines) and smallest in Region 9 (7%). The net economic benefit to the nation's households of these three Federal programs is $21 billion. Benefits exceed costs in each region; the benefit/cost ratio ranges from a low of 1.4 in Region 10 to a high of 2.0 in Region 6. 21 tables, 8 figs, 19 refs., plus 10 p. computer printout.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A previous ORNL report (ORNL/CON-13) evaluates the national energy and direct economic effects of implementing various residential energy conservation programs. This report evaluates the effects of these programs in each of the ten Federal regions. The programs considered are those proposed in the National Energy Plan: appliance efficiency targets, thermal standards for construction of new residences, and weatherization of existing housing units. Implementation of these programs might cut cumulative (1977-2000) national residential energy use by 41 QBtu. Relative energy savings are highest in Regions 7 and 8 (11 and 10% respectively, of their baselines) and smallest in Region 9 (7%). The net economic benefit to the nation's households of these three Federal programs is $21 billion. Benefits exceed costs in each region; the benefit/cost ratio ranges from a low of 1.4 in Region 10 to a high of 2.0 in Region 6. 21 tables, 8 figs, 19 refs., plus 10 p. computer printout.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A previous ORNL report (ORNL/CON-13) evaluates the national energy and direct economic effects of implementing various residential energy conservation programs. This report evaluates the effects of these programs in each of the ten Federal regions. The programs considered are those proposed in the National Energy Plan: appliance efficiency targets, thermal standards for construction of new residences, and weatherization of existing housing units. Implementation of these programs might cut cumulative (1977-2000) national residential energy use by 41 QBtu. Relative energy savings are highest in Regions 7 and 8 (11 and 10% respectively, of their baselines) and smallest in Region 9 (7%). The net economic benefit to the nation's households of these three Federal programs is $21 billion. Benefits exceed costs in each region; the benefit/cost ratio ranges from a low of 1.4 in Region 10 to a high of 2.0 in Region 6. 21 tables, 8 figs, 19 refs., plus 10 p. computer printout.

Key concepts: National laboratory, Energy conservation, Environmental science, Plan (archaeology), Environmental protection, Business, Geography, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Residential energy use to the Year 2000: a regional analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens