1991Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)Requires access

A Framework for Enhancing Operational Capabilities

Glenn A. Kent, William E. Simons

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

This report suggests a straightforward approach for linking defense system acquisition programs with our national security objectives. It reflects two related defense planning issues addressed in the report of the Packard Commission and in the Goldwater-Nichols Act, both in 1986: (1) lack of clarity regarding the relative importance and relevance of the military capabilities we are trying to achieve, and (2)excessive consumption of time, energy, and dollars in acquiring the systems to achieve these capabilities. The framework to link programs (tasks) to national security objectives elaborates on the concept of subordinate objectives-i.e., a plan of action (strategy) at one level of organization defines objectives for the next subordinate operational level. Planning efforts can be described as a hierarchy of objectives from national security objectives through subordinate objectives and finally to accomplishing specific military tasks, the fundamental building blocks of military capability.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This report suggests a straightforward approach for linking defense system acquisition programs with our national security objectives. It reflects two related defense planning issues addressed in the report of the Packard Commission and in the Goldwater-Nichols Act, both in 1986: (1) lack of clarity regarding the relative importance and relevance of the military capabilities we are trying to achieve, and (2)excessive consumption of time, energy, and dollars in acquiring the systems to achieve these capabilities. The framework to link programs (tasks) to national security objectives elaborates on the concept of subordinate objectives-i.e., a plan of action (strategy) at one level of organization defines objectives for the next subordinate operational level. Planning efforts can be described as a hierarchy of objectives from national security objectives through subordinate objectives and finally to accomplishing specific military tasks, the fundamental building blocks of military capability.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This report suggests a straightforward approach for linking defense system acquisition programs with our national security objectives. It reflects two related defense planning issues addressed in the report of the Packard Commission and in the Goldwater-Nichols Act, both in 1986: (1) lack of clarity regarding the relative importance and relevance of the military capabilities we are trying to achieve, and (2)excessive consumption of time, energy, and dollars in acquiring the systems to achieve these capabilities. The framework to link programs (tasks) to national security objectives elaborates on the concept of subordinate objectives-i.e., a plan of action (strategy) at one level of organization defines objectives for the next subordinate operational level. Planning efforts can be described as a hierarchy of objectives from national security objectives through subordinate objectives and finally to accomplishing specific military tasks, the fundamental building blocks of military capability.

Key concepts: CLARITY, Hierarchy, Relevance (law), Process management, Plan (archaeology), National security, Computer security, Commission

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Framework for Enhancing Operational Capabilities — Research Paper | ScholarLens