1985AIP conference proceedingsRequires access

Technical and economic analysis of steam-injected gas-turbine cogeneration

Eric D. Larson, Robert H. Williams

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Industrial cogeneration is gaining popularity as an energy and money saving alternative to separate steam and electricity generation. Among cogeneration technologies, gas‐turbine systems are attractive largely because of their lower capital cost and high thermodynamic efficiency. However, at industrial plants where steam and electricity loads vary daily, seasonally, or unpredictably, the economics of conventional gas turbines are often unfavorable due to low capacity utilization.Steam‐injected gas‐turbine cogeneration overcomes the part‐load problem by providing for excess steam to be injected back into the turbine to raise electrical output and generating efficiency. Under provisions of the Public Utilities Regulatory Policies Act, any excess electricity can be sold to the local grid at the prevailing avoided cost of electricity. Steam‐injected gas‐turbine cogeneration can result in a consistently high rate of return on investment over a wide range of variation in process steam loads. Moreover, this technology can also give rise to greater annual electricity production and fuel savings per unit of process steam generated, compared to simple‐cycle cogeneration, making the technology attractive from the perspective of society, as well as that of the user.Steam‐injected gas‐turbines may soon find applications in electric utility base‐load generation, as well, since it appears that electrical generating efficiencies in excess of 50% can be obtained from turbines producing of the order of 100 MW of electricity at a fully‐installed capital cost as low as $500/kW.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Industrial cogeneration is gaining popularity as an energy and money saving alternative to separate steam and electricity generation. Among cogeneration technologies, gas‐turbine systems are attractive largely because of their lower capital cost and high thermodynamic efficiency. However, at industrial plants where steam and electricity loads vary daily, seasonally, or unpredictably, the economics of conventional gas turbines are often unfavorable due to low capacity utilization.Steam‐injected gas‐turbine cogeneration overcomes the part‐load problem by providing for excess steam to be injected back into the turbine to raise electrical output and generating efficiency. Under provisions of the Public Utilities Regulatory Policies Act, any excess electricity can be sold to the local grid at the prevailing avoided cost of electricity. Steam‐injected gas‐turbine cogeneration can result in a consistently high rate of return on investment over a wide range of variation in process steam loads. Moreover, this technology can also give rise to greater annual electricity production and fuel savings per unit of process steam generated, compared to simple‐cycle cogeneration, making the technology attractive from the perspective of society, as well as that of the user.Steam‐injected gas‐turbines may soon find applications in electric utility base‐load generation, as well, since it appears that electrical generating efficiencies in excess of 50% can be obtained from turbines producing of the order of 100 MW of electricity at a fully‐installed capital cost as low as $500/kW.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Industrial cogeneration is gaining popularity as an energy and money saving alternative to separate steam and electricity generation. Among cogeneration technologies, gas‐turbine systems are attractive largely because of their lower capital cost and high thermodynamic efficiency. However, at industrial plants where steam and electricity loads vary daily, seasonally, or unpredictably, the economics of conventional gas turbines are often unfavorable due to low capacity utilization.Steam‐injected gas‐turbine cogeneration overcomes the part‐load problem by providing for excess steam to be injected back into the turbine to raise electrical output and generating efficiency. Under provisions of the Public Utilities Regulatory Policies Act, any excess electricity can be sold to the local grid at the prevailing avoided cost of electricity. Steam‐injected gas‐turbine cogeneration can result in a consistently high rate of return on investment over a wide range of variation in process steam loads. Moreover, this technology can also give rise to greater annual electricity production and fuel savings per unit of process steam generated, compared to simple‐cycle cogeneration, making the technology attractive from the perspective of society, as well as that of the user.Steam‐injected gas‐turbines may soon find applications in electric utility base‐load generation, as well, since it appears that electrical generating efficiencies in excess of 50% can be obtained from turbines producing of the order of 100 MW of electricity at a fully‐installed capital cost as low as $500/kW.

Key concepts: Cogeneration, Electricity, Combined cycle, Steam turbine, Electricity generation, Capital cost, Environmental science, Steam-electric power station

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Technical and economic analysis of steam-injected gas-turbine cogeneration — Research Paper | ScholarLens