Mammography in screening for breast cancer: a viewpoint.
Michael Dworkind, Stephen Greenberg
Abstract
Michael Dworkind, Stephen Greenberg
Abstract
Controversy exists over the usefulness of mammographic screening for breast cancer. A discussion of the risk-benefit analysis and high risk women profile help the family physician in making a decision about who should be screened with mammography. Although earlier clinical trials show no benefit, and possible risks, of screening women under age 50, current techniques of mammography subject women to far less radiation and presumably far less risk. Based on this evidence, there is merit in screening women aged 40-49 with mammography every two to three years.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Controversy exists over the usefulness of mammographic screening for breast cancer. A discussion of the risk-benefit analysis and high risk women profile help the family physician in making a decision about who should be screened with mammography. Although earlier clinical trials show no benefit, and possible risks, of screening women under age 50, current techniques of mammography subject women to far less radiation and presumably far less risk. Based on this evidence, there is merit in screening women aged 40-49 with mammography every two to three years.
Key concepts: Mammography, Medicine, Breast cancer, Breast cancer screening, Mammography screening, Screening mammography, Gynecology, Medical physics