2013Pace law reviewOpen access

Searches Incident to Arrest and the Aftermath of Arizona v. Gant – A Circuit Split as to Gant’s Applicability to Non-Vehicular Searches

Nicholas De Sena

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The nation’s struggle to balance individual rights of privacy and legitimate law enforcement efforts continues without any clear resolution in sight. The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees citizens the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, stating that search warrants shall be issued only with a showing of probable cause, a description of the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Complementing the warrant requirement is the principal that searches done without a warrant are per se unreasonable. The Supreme Court, however, has recognized exceptions to the warrant requirement under certain situations, based on various legal theories and factual scenarios. This article will discuss only one of these exceptions, searches incident to arrest. The evolving standards and rules for these searches, their significance, how and when they apply, and recent changes in the scope of these searches will be the main focus of this article. In addition, a circuit split regarding this issue will be discussed and analyzed.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The nation’s struggle to balance individual rights of privacy and legitimate law enforcement efforts continues without any clear resolution in sight. The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees citizens the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, stating that search warrants shall be issued only with a showing of probable cause, a description of the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Complementing the warrant requirement is the principal that searches done without a warrant are per se unreasonable. The Supreme Court, however, has recognized exceptions to the warrant requirement under certain situations, based on various legal theories and factual scenarios. This article will discuss only one of these exceptions, searches incident to arrest. The evolving standards and rules for these searches, their significance, how and when they apply, and recent changes in the scope of these searches will be the main focus of this article. In addition, a circuit split regarding this issue will be discussed and analyzed.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The nation’s struggle to balance individual rights of privacy and legitimate law enforcement efforts continues without any clear resolution in sight. The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees citizens the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, stating that search warrants shall be issued only with a showing of probable cause, a description of the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Complementing the warrant requirement is the principal that searches done without a warrant are per se unreasonable. The Supreme Court, however, has recognized exceptions to the warrant requirement under certain situations, based on various legal theories and factual scenarios. This article will discuss only one of these exceptions, searches incident to arrest. The evolving standards and rules for these searches, their significance, how and when they apply, and recent changes in the scope of these searches will be the main focus of this article. In addition, a circuit split regarding this issue will be discussed and analyzed.

Key concepts: Warrant, Search and seizure, Probable cause, Expectation of privacy, Law, Principal (computer security), Supreme court, Scope (computer science)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Searches Incident to Arrest and the Aftermath of Arizona v. Gant – A Circuit Split as to Gant’s Applicability to Non-Vehicular Searches — Research Paper | ScholarLens