1989Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)Requires access

Evaluation of the bistatic equivalence theorem for the near and far-field radar cross section of complex targets

Charles G. Walls

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This research examined the applicability of the monostatic-bistatic equivalence theorem (MBET) and associated extensions in determining the extent to which correlation exists between monostatic and bistatic data for both the near and far-field. A secondary objective was to determine whether reliable bistatic near-field radar cross section (RCS) data could be collected on a range originally designed to take monostatic far-field measurements. Dr. David Falconer developed two extensions of the MBET in an effort to estimate the bistatic RCS pattern in both the near and far-field by measuring the monostatic RCS pattern at one-half the bistatic angle, at a reduced frequency, and, for the near-field case, at an adjusted target-to-receiver separation range. The pattern representation and accuracy of these two extensions were examined by measuring the RCS of an ogive, a circular flat plate, and two circular cylinders of different lengths. Theses.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This research examined the applicability of the monostatic-bistatic equivalence theorem (MBET) and associated extensions in determining the extent to which correlation exists between monostatic and bistatic data for both the near and far-field. A secondary objective was to determine whether reliable bistatic near-field radar cross section (RCS) data could be collected on a range originally designed to take monostatic far-field measurements. Dr. David Falconer developed two extensions of the MBET in an effort to estimate the bistatic RCS pattern in both the near and far-field by measuring the monostatic RCS pattern at one-half the bistatic angle, at a reduced frequency, and, for the near-field case, at an adjusted target-to-receiver separation range. The pattern representation and accuracy of these two extensions were examined by measuring the RCS of an ogive, a circular flat plate, and two circular cylinders of different lengths. Theses.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This research examined the applicability of the monostatic-bistatic equivalence theorem (MBET) and associated extensions in determining the extent to which correlation exists between monostatic and bistatic data for both the near and far-field. A secondary objective was to determine whether reliable bistatic near-field radar cross section (RCS) data could be collected on a range originally designed to take monostatic far-field measurements. Dr. David Falconer developed two extensions of the MBET in an effort to estimate the bistatic RCS pattern in both the near and far-field by measuring the monostatic RCS pattern at one-half the bistatic angle, at a reduced frequency, and, for the near-field case, at an adjusted target-to-receiver separation range. The pattern representation and accuracy of these two extensions were examined by measuring the RCS of an ogive, a circular flat plate, and two circular cylinders of different lengths. Theses.

Key concepts: Bistatic radar, Equivalence (formal languages), Near and far field, Radar cross-section, Physics, Computer science, Acoustics, Radar

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of the bistatic equivalence theorem for the near and far-field radar cross section of complex targets — Research Paper | ScholarLens