Evaluation of the bistatic equivalence theorem for the near and far-field radar cross section of complex targets
Charles G. Walls
Abstract
Charles G. Walls
Abstract
This research examined the applicability of the monostatic-bistatic equivalence theorem (MBET) and associated extensions in determining the extent to which correlation exists between monostatic and bistatic data for both the near and far-field. A secondary objective was to determine whether reliable bistatic near-field radar cross section (RCS) data could be collected on a range originally designed to take monostatic far-field measurements. Dr. David Falconer developed two extensions of the MBET in an effort to estimate the bistatic RCS pattern in both the near and far-field by measuring the monostatic RCS pattern at one-half the bistatic angle, at a reduced frequency, and, for the near-field case, at an adjusted target-to-receiver separation range. The pattern representation and accuracy of these two extensions were examined by measuring the RCS of an ogive, a circular flat plate, and two circular cylinders of different lengths. Theses.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This research examined the applicability of the monostatic-bistatic equivalence theorem (MBET) and associated extensions in determining the extent to which correlation exists between monostatic and bistatic data for both the near and far-field. A secondary objective was to determine whether reliable bistatic near-field radar cross section (RCS) data could be collected on a range originally designed to take monostatic far-field measurements. Dr. David Falconer developed two extensions of the MBET in an effort to estimate the bistatic RCS pattern in both the near and far-field by measuring the monostatic RCS pattern at one-half the bistatic angle, at a reduced frequency, and, for the near-field case, at an adjusted target-to-receiver separation range. The pattern representation and accuracy of these two extensions were examined by measuring the RCS of an ogive, a circular flat plate, and two circular cylinders of different lengths. Theses.
Key concepts: Bistatic radar, Equivalence (formal languages), Near and far field, Radar cross-section, Physics, Computer science, Acoustics, Radar