2004Publication of: Society of Automotive EngineersRequires access

CRASHWORTHINESS SIMULATIONS COMPARING PAM-CRASH AND LS-DYNA. IN: CAE METHODS FOR VEHICLE CRASHWORTHINESS AND OCCUPANT SAFETY, AND SAFETY-CRITICAL SYSTEMS

K.N. Solanki, David Oglesby, C. L. Burton, Hongbing Fang, M.F. Horstemeyer

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Finite element (FE) models of vehicles have been increasingly used in component design and crashworthiness evaluation. As vehicle FE models are becoming more sophisticated in terms of their accuracy, robustness, fidelity, and size, the need to compare different FEA codes has become more apparent. In this paper, FE simulations of a 1996 Dodge Neon are compared using LS-DYNA and PAM-CRASH codes in an effort to keep sameness of the material models, meshes, and boundary conditions. The original Neon mesh and material properties were developed at the FHWA/NHTSA National Crash Analysis Center (NCAC) for LS-DYNA and subsequently modified for this study. The comparisons between test data and simulation results of the full-scale vehicle in terms of overall impact deformation, component failure modes, and velocity and acceleration at various locations in the vehicle show good correlations with only minor discrepancies.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Finite element (FE) models of vehicles have been increasingly used in component design and crashworthiness evaluation. As vehicle FE models are becoming more sophisticated in terms of their accuracy, robustness, fidelity, and size, the need to compare different FEA codes has become more apparent. In this paper, FE simulations of a 1996 Dodge Neon are compared using LS-DYNA and PAM-CRASH codes in an effort to keep sameness of the material models, meshes, and boundary conditions. The original Neon mesh and material properties were developed at the FHWA/NHTSA National Crash Analysis Center (NCAC) for LS-DYNA and subsequently modified for this study. The comparisons between test data and simulation results of the full-scale vehicle in terms of overall impact deformation, component failure modes, and velocity and acceleration at various locations in the vehicle show good correlations with only minor discrepancies.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Finite element (FE) models of vehicles have been increasingly used in component design and crashworthiness evaluation. As vehicle FE models are becoming more sophisticated in terms of their accuracy, robustness, fidelity, and size, the need to compare different FEA codes has become more apparent. In this paper, FE simulations of a 1996 Dodge Neon are compared using LS-DYNA and PAM-CRASH codes in an effort to keep sameness of the material models, meshes, and boundary conditions. The original Neon mesh and material properties were developed at the FHWA/NHTSA National Crash Analysis Center (NCAC) for LS-DYNA and subsequently modified for this study. The comparisons between test data and simulation results of the full-scale vehicle in terms of overall impact deformation, component failure modes, and velocity and acceleration at various locations in the vehicle show good correlations with only minor discrepancies.

Key concepts: Crashworthiness, Crash, LS-DYNA, Structural engineering, Finite element method, Engineering, Crash test, Robustness (evolution)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
CRASHWORTHINESS SIMULATIONS COMPARING PAM-CRASH AND LS-DYNA. IN: CAE METHODS FOR VEHICLE CRASHWORTHINESS AND OCCUPANT SAFETY, AND SAFETY-CRITICAL SYSTEMS — Research Paper | ScholarLens