1999PubMedRequires access

[Effects of the bolus injection rate on anesthesia induction with propofol].

Yo Kobayashi, Akihito Tsuchida, Y Kamada, Shuji Seki, T Ichimiya, A Namiki

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

We examined the influence of the bolus injection rate of propofol on the cardiovascular depression and injection pain. Fifty-one patients of ASA grade 1 or 2 were randomly allocated to two groups. After premedication with midazolam 0.06 mg.kg-1 and atropine 0.006 mg.kg-1 i.m., propofol 2 mg.kg-1 was injected to a forearm vein at a rate of 800 ml.hr-1 in Group A or 1 ml.s-1 in Group B. Anesthesia was maintained thereafter with 67% nitrous oxide in oxygen and propofol infused at 6 mg.kg-1.hr-1. The incidence and severity of pain on injection were lower in Group B compared with Group A, but the difference was not statistically significant. The induction time was significantly shorter in Group B than in Group A (40 vs. 73 sec: P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the two injection rates in peak reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate. In conclusion, rapid injection of propofol was effective to shorten the induction time without any adverse effects.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We examined the influence of the bolus injection rate of propofol on the cardiovascular depression and injection pain. Fifty-one patients of ASA grade 1 or 2 were randomly allocated to two groups. After premedication with midazolam 0.06 mg.kg-1 and atropine 0.006 mg.kg-1 i.m., propofol 2 mg.kg-1 was injected to a forearm vein at a rate of 800 ml.hr-1 in Group A or 1 ml.s-1 in Group B. Anesthesia was maintained thereafter with 67% nitrous oxide in oxygen and propofol infused at 6 mg.kg-1.hr-1. The incidence and severity of pain on injection were lower in Group B compared with Group A, but the difference was not statistically significant. The induction time was significantly shorter in Group B than in Group A (40 vs. 73 sec: P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the two injection rates in peak reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate. In conclusion, rapid injection of propofol was effective to shorten the induction time without any adverse effects.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We examined the influence of the bolus injection rate of propofol on the cardiovascular depression and injection pain. Fifty-one patients of ASA grade 1 or 2 were randomly allocated to two groups. After premedication with midazolam 0.06 mg.kg-1 and atropine 0.006 mg.kg-1 i.m., propofol 2 mg.kg-1 was injected to a forearm vein at a rate of 800 ml.hr-1 in Group A or 1 ml.s-1 in Group B. Anesthesia was maintained thereafter with 67% nitrous oxide in oxygen and propofol infused at 6 mg.kg-1.hr-1. The incidence and severity of pain on injection were lower in Group B compared with Group A, but the difference was not statistically significant. The induction time was significantly shorter in Group B than in Group A (40 vs. 73 sec: P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the two injection rates in peak reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate. In conclusion, rapid injection of propofol was effective to shorten the induction time without any adverse effects.

Key concepts: Propofol, Anesthesia, Premedication, Medicine, Midazolam, Heart rate, Bolus (digestion), Atropine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Effects of the bolus injection rate on anesthesia induction with propofol]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens