Nifedipine versus ritodrine for suppressing preterm labor.
William R. Meyer, H W Randall, William L. Graves
Abstract
William R. Meyer, H W Randall, William L. Graves
Abstract
Fifty-eight women in preterm labor were selected randomly to receive either oral nifedipine or intravenous ritodrine hydrochloride. In comparison to ritodrine, nifedipine had similar tocolytic efficacy with fewer adverse maternal and fetal side effects. On Doppler studies nifedipine had an insignificant effect on umbilical blood flow. Preliminary data suggest that nifedipine is a safe, effective and well-tolerated tocolytic agent. It may prove to be a suitable alternative to ritodrine hydrochloride, especially for women in whom beta-sympathomimetics are contraindicated.
OpenAlex reports 68 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Fifty-eight women in preterm labor were selected randomly to receive either oral nifedipine or intravenous ritodrine hydrochloride. In comparison to ritodrine, nifedipine had similar tocolytic efficacy with fewer adverse maternal and fetal side effects. On Doppler studies nifedipine had an insignificant effect on umbilical blood flow. Preliminary data suggest that nifedipine is a safe, effective and well-tolerated tocolytic agent. It may prove to be a suitable alternative to ritodrine hydrochloride, especially for women in whom beta-sympathomimetics are contraindicated.
Key concepts: Ritodrine, Nifedipine, Medicine, Tocolytic, Tocolytic agent, Anesthesia, Preterm labour, Preterm labor