1993•NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA)Requires access

An end-to-end pointing budget approach to planetary observing systems with application to EOS

Arthur J. Throckmorton

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Previously published error budgets have focused on spacecraft error sources for pointing error and have tended to include only spacecraft pointing rather than the ultimate geolocation of each pixel of dam onto a well-defined spot on the surface of the Earth. A systematic approach to geolocation error budgeting, including all contributors in the geolocation process is presented. Its structure allows simultaneous expression of the needs of instrument teams as well as spacecraft design teams. It allows explicit acknowledgement of approximations made for on-board control as well as the ultimate geolocation accuracy achievable after ground processing and exploits the commonality inherent in the on-board and post-processing error budgets. It also includes the uncontrolled and unmeasured spacecraft jitter. This approach can be used to investigate the mission-wide benefit of a variety of design choices, (such as on-board sensing and ground correction of measurements contrasted with on-board correction of measurements). Additionally, in light of increasing accuracy requirements as sensor resolution improves, numerous non-spacecraft contributors to geolocation error are quantified.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Previously published error budgets have focused on spacecraft error sources for pointing error and have tended to include only spacecraft pointing rather than the ultimate geolocation of each pixel of dam onto a well-defined spot on the surface of the Earth. A systematic approach to geolocation error budgeting, including all contributors in the geolocation process is presented. Its structure allows simultaneous expression of the needs of instrument teams as well as spacecraft design teams. It allows explicit acknowledgement of approximations made for on-board control as well as the ultimate geolocation accuracy achievable after ground processing and exploits the commonality inherent in the on-board and post-processing error budgets. It also includes the uncontrolled and unmeasured spacecraft jitter. This approach can be used to investigate the mission-wide benefit of a variety of design choices, (such as on-board sensing and ground correction of measurements contrasted with on-board correction of measurements). Additionally, in light of increasing accuracy requirements as sensor resolution improves, numerous non-spacecraft contributors to geolocation error are quantified.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Previously published error budgets have focused on spacecraft error sources for pointing error and have tended to include only spacecraft pointing rather than the ultimate geolocation of each pixel of dam onto a well-defined spot on the surface of the Earth. A systematic approach to geolocation error budgeting, including all contributors in the geolocation process is presented. Its structure allows simultaneous expression of the needs of instrument teams as well as spacecraft design teams. It allows explicit acknowledgement of approximations made for on-board control as well as the ultimate geolocation accuracy achievable after ground processing and exploits the commonality inherent in the on-board and post-processing error budgets. It also includes the uncontrolled and unmeasured spacecraft jitter. This approach can be used to investigate the mission-wide benefit of a variety of design choices, (such as on-board sensing and ground correction of measurements contrasted with on-board correction of measurements). Additionally, in light of increasing accuracy requirements as sensor resolution improves, numerous non-spacecraft contributors to geolocation error are quantified.

Key concepts: Geolocation, Spacecraft, Computer science, Remote sensing, Error detection and correction, Acknowledgement, Spacecraft design, Real-time computing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An end-to-end pointing budget approach to planetary observing systems with application to EOS — Research Paper | ScholarLens