Regional Transit Stew: Consensus Building and Transit Building in Metro Detroit
Leo E. Hanifin, Scott Douglas
Abstract
Leo E. Hanifin, Scott Douglas
Abstract
This report describes the factors that enable and inhibit the development of effective regional transit, focusing on Metro Detroit and four peer regions: Atlanta, Cleveland, Denver and St. Louis. It provides key findings related to transit leadership and politics, especially those related to the successful planning and funding of regional transit. The report presents a three-phase process beginning with sharing and recognizing all stakeholders’ perspectives on what they want and need from regional transit. In the second phase, transit professionals translate that vision into a specific transit system design and plans to develop it. In phase three, stakeholders actively advocate for the plan and its funding by emphasizing the values and impact of the system that are most important to specific segments of the population. The report discusses the need for a very diverse and active coalition and presents examples of successful coalitions in other cities.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This report describes the factors that enable and inhibit the development of effective regional transit, focusing on Metro Detroit and four peer regions: Atlanta, Cleveland, Denver and St. Louis. It provides key findings related to transit leadership and politics, especially those related to the successful planning and funding of regional transit. The report presents a three-phase process beginning with sharing and recognizing all stakeholders’ perspectives on what they want and need from regional transit. In the second phase, transit professionals translate that vision into a specific transit system design and plans to develop it. In phase three, stakeholders actively advocate for the plan and its funding by emphasizing the values and impact of the system that are most important to specific segments of the population. The report discusses the need for a very diverse and active coalition and presents examples of successful coalitions in other cities.
Key concepts: Transit (satellite), Atlanta, Plan (archaeology), Rapid transit, Political science, Phase (matter), Population, Public transport