Geometric models of particles - the missing ingredient
Mark J Hadley
Abstract
Open-access reader
Mark J Hadley
Abstract
Open-access reader
Einstein's dream of describing elementary particles as solutions of a classical field theory is severely limited by our current understanding of Nature. Quantum theory is inconsistent with any local realistic theory such as evolving topological structures in space. It is shown that allowing time reversal as an intrinsic part of the structure of elementary particles allows general relativity to explain quantum theory in principle. Such structures may also explain electric charge and spin-half.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Einstein's dream of describing elementary particles as solutions of a classical field theory is severely limited by our current understanding of Nature. Quantum theory is inconsistent with any local realistic theory such as evolving topological structures in space. It is shown that allowing time reversal as an intrinsic part of the structure of elementary particles allows general relativity to explain quantum theory in principle. Such structures may also explain electric charge and spin-half.
Key concepts: Theoretical physics, General relativity, Physics, Unified field theory, Theory of relativity, Quantum field theory, Charge (physics), Spin (aerodynamics)