2004Geophysical Research LettersRequires access

Quasi‐stationary ENSO wave signals versus the Antarctic Circumpolar Wave scenario

Young‐Hyang Park, Fabien Roquet, Frédéric Vivier

Open publisher page 37 citations

Abstract

Two conflicting views on the causal mechanism of the Antarctic interannual variability often appear in the literature, i.e., whether it is remotely teleconnected to tropical ENSO events or is a self‐sustained eastward propagating circumpolar wave generated locally by an ocean‐atmosphere coupling mechanism. Using a Fourier decomposition into stationary and propagating components of several oceanic and atmospheric variables, we show that most of the Antarctic interannual variability can be explained by a geographically phase‐locked standing wave train linked to tropical ENSO episodes. This ENSO‐modulated quasi‐stationary variability is not zonally uniform, rather, the strongest ENSO impact is consistently concentrated in the Pacific sector of the Southern Ocean. The eastward propagating wave component is found to be not only minor (25% of variability) but also intermittent in phase, yielding little support for the so‐called Antarctic Circumpolar Wave scenario.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Two conflicting views on the causal mechanism of the Antarctic interannual variability often appear in the literature, i.e., whether it is remotely teleconnected to tropical ENSO events or is a self‐sustained eastward propagating circumpolar wave generated locally by an ocean‐atmosphere coupling mechanism. Using a Fourier decomposition into stationary and propagating components of several oceanic and atmospheric variables, we show that most of the Antarctic interannual variability can be explained by a geographically phase‐locked standing wave train linked to tropical ENSO episodes. This ENSO‐modulated quasi‐stationary variability is not zonally uniform, rather, the strongest ENSO impact is consistently concentrated in the Pacific sector of the Southern Ocean. The eastward propagating wave component is found to be not only minor (25% of variability) but also intermittent in phase, yielding little support for the so‐called Antarctic Circumpolar Wave scenario.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 37 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Two conflicting views on the causal mechanism of the Antarctic interannual variability often appear in the literature, i.e., whether it is remotely teleconnected to tropical ENSO events or is a self‐sustained eastward propagating circumpolar wave generated locally by an ocean‐atmosphere coupling mechanism. Using a Fourier decomposition into stationary and propagating components of several oceanic and atmospheric variables, we show that most of the Antarctic interannual variability can be explained by a geographically phase‐locked standing wave train linked to tropical ENSO episodes. This ENSO‐modulated quasi‐stationary variability is not zonally uniform, rather, the strongest ENSO impact is consistently concentrated in the Pacific sector of the Southern Ocean. The eastward propagating wave component is found to be not only minor (25% of variability) but also intermittent in phase, yielding little support for the so‐called Antarctic Circumpolar Wave scenario.

Key concepts: Circumpolar star, Climatology, El Niño Southern Oscillation, Geology, Atmosphere (unit), Atmospheric sciences, Environmental science, Oceanography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Quasi‐stationary ENSO wave signals versus the Antarctic Circumpolar Wave scenario — Research Paper | ScholarLens