2002•Unpublished venueRequires access

Vegetation indices for Landsat images

N.A. Boehmer

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Satellite-based remote sensing of vegetation densities is a growing technology with great future potential owing to the proliferation of increasingly sophisticated space-based sensors and the computational tools required to analyze the wealth of data. We explore algorithms that create vegetation mappings from the satellite image data. Specifically, we study and compare the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and its derivatives, the Atmospherically Resistant Vegetation Index (ARVI) and the Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI). We use Landsat TM images taken over the southern tip of Texas. For the set of images used in the study the NDVI worked well in identifying vegetation densities. The ARVI did not work for this locale and set of TM images. The SAVI worked slightly better than the NDVI in that the mappings that it produced were more distinct (i.e., better contrast). However, SAVI suffered from slightly more noise than did NDVI.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Satellite-based remote sensing of vegetation densities is a growing technology with great future potential owing to the proliferation of increasingly sophisticated space-based sensors and the computational tools required to analyze the wealth of data. We explore algorithms that create vegetation mappings from the satellite image data. Specifically, we study and compare the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and its derivatives, the Atmospherically Resistant Vegetation Index (ARVI) and the Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI). We use Landsat TM images taken over the southern tip of Texas. For the set of images used in the study the NDVI worked well in identifying vegetation densities. The ARVI did not work for this locale and set of TM images. The SAVI worked slightly better than the NDVI in that the mappings that it produced were more distinct (i.e., better contrast). However, SAVI suffered from slightly more noise than did NDVI.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Satellite-based remote sensing of vegetation densities is a growing technology with great future potential owing to the proliferation of increasingly sophisticated space-based sensors and the computational tools required to analyze the wealth of data. We explore algorithms that create vegetation mappings from the satellite image data. Specifically, we study and compare the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and its derivatives, the Atmospherically Resistant Vegetation Index (ARVI) and the Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI). We use Landsat TM images taken over the southern tip of Texas. For the set of images used in the study the NDVI worked well in identifying vegetation densities. The ARVI did not work for this locale and set of TM images. The SAVI worked slightly better than the NDVI in that the mappings that it produced were more distinct (i.e., better contrast). However, SAVI suffered from slightly more noise than did NDVI.

Key concepts: Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, Vegetation (pathology), Vegetation Index, Remote sensing, Enhanced vegetation index, Satellite, Data set, Index (typography)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Vegetation indices for Landsat images — Research Paper | ScholarLens