Chorionic villus sampling as the primary diagnostic tool in prenatal diagnosis. Should it replace genetic amniocentesis?
T.A. Doran
Abstract
T.A. Doran
Abstract
Recent studies in Canada and the United States have shown that chorionic villus sampling (CVS) is both safe and accurate, with a fetal loss rate likely slightly higher than that of amniocentesis but still at an acceptable level (1%). Although CVS may become the dominant prenatal diagnosis procedure, it is unlikely that it will completely replace amniocentesis. The two procedures are essentially complementary in the provision of prenatal diagnosis in the first and second trimesters.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Recent studies in Canada and the United States have shown that chorionic villus sampling (CVS) is both safe and accurate, with a fetal loss rate likely slightly higher than that of amniocentesis but still at an acceptable level (1%). Although CVS may become the dominant prenatal diagnosis procedure, it is unlikely that it will completely replace amniocentesis. The two procedures are essentially complementary in the provision of prenatal diagnosis in the first and second trimesters.
Key concepts: Chorionic villus sampling, Amniocentesis, Medicine, Prenatal diagnosis, Obstetrics, Chorionic villi, Pregnancy, Sampling (signal processing)