1975•Unpublished venueRequires access

ANOTHER ALTERNATIVE: THE CASE FOR LIGHT RAIL. PART II

Stephan Floyd Taylor

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The objectives of providing better mass transit through conventional means (bus, heavy rail transit and personal rapid transit) are examined, and the possibilities of increasing system efficiency by incorporating light rail rapid transit into the overall plan is explored. A discussion the physical characteristics of light rail cover aspects of the vehicle, the operator, fare collection, design criteria and standardization, right-of-way, stations, controls and communication. Light rail's basic characteristic is versatility, and it can be used effectively in: basic service supplemented by bus; supplement to high capacity rapid transit; rapid transit feeder service; high-speed suburban service; and short haul intercity service. Light rail's capability to meet fluctuating traffic demand is discussed and comments are made on light rail as an instrument for integrated public transportation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The objectives of providing better mass transit through conventional means (bus, heavy rail transit and personal rapid transit) are examined, and the possibilities of increasing system efficiency by incorporating light rail rapid transit into the overall plan is explored. A discussion the physical characteristics of light rail cover aspects of the vehicle, the operator, fare collection, design criteria and standardization, right-of-way, stations, controls and communication. Light rail's basic characteristic is versatility, and it can be used effectively in: basic service supplemented by bus; supplement to high capacity rapid transit; rapid transit feeder service; high-speed suburban service; and short haul intercity service. Light rail's capability to meet fluctuating traffic demand is discussed and comments are made on light rail as an instrument for integrated public transportation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The objectives of providing better mass transit through conventional means (bus, heavy rail transit and personal rapid transit) are examined, and the possibilities of increasing system efficiency by incorporating light rail rapid transit into the overall plan is explored. A discussion the physical characteristics of light rail cover aspects of the vehicle, the operator, fare collection, design criteria and standardization, right-of-way, stations, controls and communication. Light rail's basic characteristic is versatility, and it can be used effectively in: basic service supplemented by bus; supplement to high capacity rapid transit; rapid transit feeder service; high-speed suburban service; and short haul intercity service. Light rail's capability to meet fluctuating traffic demand is discussed and comments are made on light rail as an instrument for integrated public transportation.

Key concepts: Transport engineering, Light rail, Light rail transit, Public transport, Standardization, Transit (satellite), Service (business), Rail transit

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
ANOTHER ALTERNATIVE: THE CASE FOR LIGHT RAIL. PART II — Research Paper | ScholarLens