1995bepress Legal RepositoryOpen access

EPA Rulemaking Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act: The Need for Reform

Jennifer McCoid

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

As originally enacted, the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA)l modified the federal executive agency rule-making process by requiring agencies to examine, and seek to reduce, the impact of any rules the agencies promulgate on small businesses and other small entities.2 In passing the RFA, Congress found that federal regulations were applied uniformly to small and large businesses regardless of the size of the regulated entities.3 The uniform application of regulations, Congress found, retarded the development of small businesses.4 Small businesses are disadvantaged because their regulatory costs are proportionately larger than the costs of large businesses, which can spread compliance costs over a larger output.5 Another problem caused by the uniform application of regulations is that small businesses do not have the legal, economic, or technical personnel or the resources to achieve regulatory compliance economies of scale.6 Con-

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

As originally enacted, the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA)l modified the federal executive agency rule-making process by requiring agencies to examine, and seek to reduce, the impact of any rules the agencies promulgate on small businesses and other small entities.2 In passing the RFA, Congress found that federal regulations were applied uniformly to small and large businesses regardless of the size of the regulated entities.3 The uniform application of regulations, Congress found, retarded the development of small businesses.4 Small businesses are disadvantaged because their regulatory costs are proportionately larger than the costs of large businesses, which can spread compliance costs over a larger output.5 Another problem caused by the uniform application of regulations is that small businesses do not have the legal, economic, or technical personnel or the resources to achieve regulatory compliance economies of scale.6 Con-

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

As originally enacted, the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA)l modified the federal executive agency rule-making process by requiring agencies to examine, and seek to reduce, the impact of any rules the agencies promulgate on small businesses and other small entities.2 In passing the RFA, Congress found that federal regulations were applied uniformly to small and large businesses regardless of the size of the regulated entities.3 The uniform application of regulations, Congress found, retarded the development of small businesses.4 Small businesses are disadvantaged because their regulatory costs are proportionately larger than the costs of large businesses, which can spread compliance costs over a larger output.5 Another problem caused by the uniform application of regulations is that small businesses do not have the legal, economic, or technical personnel or the resources to achieve regulatory compliance economies of scale.6 Con-

Key concepts: Rulemaking, Regulatory reform, Flexibility (engineering), Business, Clean Air Act, Public economics, Economics, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EPA Rulemaking Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act: The Need for Reform — Research Paper | ScholarLens