EPA Rulemaking Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act: The Need for Reform
Jennifer McCoid
Abstract
Open-access reader
Jennifer McCoid
Abstract
Open-access reader
As originally enacted, the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA)l modified the federal executive agency rule-making process by requiring agencies to examine, and seek to reduce, the impact of any rules the agencies promulgate on small businesses and other small entities.2 In passing the RFA, Congress found that federal regulations were applied uniformly to small and large businesses regardless of the size of the regulated entities.3 The uniform application of regulations, Congress found, retarded the development of small businesses.4 Small businesses are disadvantaged because their regulatory costs are proportionately larger than the costs of large businesses, which can spread compliance costs over a larger output.5 Another problem caused by the uniform application of regulations is that small businesses do not have the legal, economic, or technical personnel or the resources to achieve regulatory compliance economies of scale.6 Con-
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
As originally enacted, the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA)l modified the federal executive agency rule-making process by requiring agencies to examine, and seek to reduce, the impact of any rules the agencies promulgate on small businesses and other small entities.2 In passing the RFA, Congress found that federal regulations were applied uniformly to small and large businesses regardless of the size of the regulated entities.3 The uniform application of regulations, Congress found, retarded the development of small businesses.4 Small businesses are disadvantaged because their regulatory costs are proportionately larger than the costs of large businesses, which can spread compliance costs over a larger output.5 Another problem caused by the uniform application of regulations is that small businesses do not have the legal, economic, or technical personnel or the resources to achieve regulatory compliance economies of scale.6 Con-
Key concepts: Rulemaking, Regulatory reform, Flexibility (engineering), Business, Clean Air Act, Public economics, Economics, Chemistry