2008•SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Just Back from the Human Rights Council

Connie de la Vega

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Constance de la Vega contributes to a panel discussion her personal experiences at the Human Rights Council. Her comments first recount the human rights successes of the former UN Commission on Human Rights. Second, she analyzes the reasons given for creating the Council to replace the Commission. Her comments conclude by assessing the pros and cons of the changes brought on by the establishment of the Human Rights Council. Changes discussed include the adoption of the Universal Periodic Review, term limits, suspension of human rights violators, a more flexible process for calling for emergency sessions, additional sessions, resolutions more frequently going to a vote instead of being passed by consensus, etc.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Constance de la Vega contributes to a panel discussion her personal experiences at the Human Rights Council. Her comments first recount the human rights successes of the former UN Commission on Human Rights. Second, she analyzes the reasons given for creating the Council to replace the Commission. Her comments conclude by assessing the pros and cons of the changes brought on by the establishment of the Human Rights Council. Changes discussed include the adoption of the Universal Periodic Review, term limits, suspension of human rights violators, a more flexible process for calling for emergency sessions, additional sessions, resolutions more frequently going to a vote instead of being passed by consensus, etc.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Constance de la Vega contributes to a panel discussion her personal experiences at the Human Rights Council. Her comments first recount the human rights successes of the former UN Commission on Human Rights. Second, she analyzes the reasons given for creating the Council to replace the Commission. Her comments conclude by assessing the pros and cons of the changes brought on by the establishment of the Human Rights Council. Changes discussed include the adoption of the Universal Periodic Review, term limits, suspension of human rights violators, a more flexible process for calling for emergency sessions, additional sessions, resolutions more frequently going to a vote instead of being passed by consensus, etc.

Key concepts: Human rights, Commission, Political science, Law, International human rights law, Fundamental rights, Public administration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Just Back from the Human Rights Council — Research Paper | ScholarLens