2007Alimentary Pharmacology & TherapeuticsRequires access

Long‐term follow‐up of patients with mild to moderate drug‐induced liver injury

Einar S. Björnsson, Evangelos Kalaitzakis, V. AV KLINTEBERG, N. ALEM, Rolf Olsson

Open publisher page 58 citations

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the long-term prognosis of patients diagnosed with drug-induced liver injury, and the nature of the liver injury. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury between 1994 and 2005 were identified in a university hospital clinic. Patients surviving drug-induced liver injury-associated liver failure were excluded. RESULTS: Seventy-seven cases were identified and those who were alive (69) were invited to attend follow-up. Of those patients who had died, none had died of liver disease. Of those patients who had survived, 59 were reviewed in the clinic. Patients had a median follow-up of 48 months. Before the diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury, nine had a chronic liver disease, four with autoimmune hepatitis, two with non-alcoholic liver disease, one each with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. There was no evidence of progression of their liver disease during follow-up. Among 50 patients without a known liver disease prior to the drug-induced liver injury, 10 had abnormal liver tests. Diagnostic work-up revealed alternative cause of liver disease in all except three patients (6%), who had asymptomatic abnormal liver tests (but normal bilirubin in all). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic abnormalities in liver tests, not explained by an identified liver disease, are very rare in patients previously diagnosed with drug-induced liver injury. This group of patients did not seem to have a clinically significant liver injury at long-term follow-up.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM: To evaluate the long-term prognosis of patients diagnosed with drug-induced liver injury, and the nature of the liver injury. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury between 1994 and 2005 were identified in a university hospital clinic. Patients surviving drug-induced liver injury-associated liver failure were excluded. RESULTS: Seventy-seven cases were identified and those who were alive (69) were invited to attend follow-up. Of those patients who had died, none had died of liver disease. Of those patients who had survived, 59 were reviewed in the clinic. Patients had a median follow-up of 48 months. Before the diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury, nine had a chronic liver disease, four with autoimmune hepatitis, two with non-alcoholic liver disease, one each with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. There was no evidence of progression of their liver disease during follow-up. Among 50 patients without a known liver disease prior to the drug-induced liver injury, 10 had abnormal liver tests. Diagnostic work-up revealed alternative cause of liver disease in all except three patients (6%), who had asymptomatic abnormal liver tests (but normal bilirubin in all). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic abnormalities in liver tests, not explained by an identified liver disease, are very rare in patients previously diagnosed with drug-induced liver injury. This group of patients did not seem to have a clinically significant liver injury at long-term follow-up.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 58 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM: To evaluate the long-term prognosis of patients diagnosed with drug-induced liver injury, and the nature of the liver injury. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury between 1994 and 2005 were identified in a university hospital clinic. Patients surviving drug-induced liver injury-associated liver failure were excluded. RESULTS: Seventy-seven cases were identified and those who were alive (69) were invited to attend follow-up. Of those patients who had died, none had died of liver disease. Of those patients who had survived, 59 were reviewed in the clinic. Patients had a median follow-up of 48 months. Before the diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury, nine had a chronic liver disease, four with autoimmune hepatitis, two with non-alcoholic liver disease, one each with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. There was no evidence of progression of their liver disease during follow-up. Among 50 patients without a known liver disease prior to the drug-induced liver injury, 10 had abnormal liver tests. Diagnostic work-up revealed alternative cause of liver disease in all except three patients (6%), who had asymptomatic abnormal liver tests (but normal bilirubin in all). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic abnormalities in liver tests, not explained by an identified liver disease, are very rare in patients previously diagnosed with drug-induced liver injury. This group of patients did not seem to have a clinically significant liver injury at long-term follow-up.

Key concepts: Medicine, Liver injury, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Liver disease, Asymptomatic, Fatty liver, Alcoholic liver disease

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Long‐term follow‐up of patients with mild to moderate drug‐induced liver injury — Research Paper | ScholarLens