1990•The William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository (William & Mary)Open access

Exclusive or Concurrent Jurisdiction Over Private Civil RICO Actions: Finding the Appropriate Reference

Kimberly O'd. Thompson

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

RICO is the acronym for Title IX of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, entitled "Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations."'Congress enacted RICO primarily to combat organized crime, specifically racketeering activity.2 RICO prohibits:(1) conducting the affairs or participating in the conduct of the affairs of an enterprise engaged in or affecting interstate commerce through a pattern of racketeering activity;(2) acquiring or maintaining an interest in such an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity;(3) using funds obtained through a pattern of racketeering activity to invest in any such enterprise.RICO also makes it illegal to conspire to engage in any of the foregoing conduct.3 "Racketeering activity" includes certain enumerated criminal acts under federal or state law. 4 Besides providing for criminal * Editors' Note: Well into the publication of this Note, the United States Supreme Court decided that state courts have concurrent jurisdiction over civil RICO claims in Tafflin v. Levitt, No. 88-1650 (Jan.22, 1990) (LEXIS, Genfed library, US file).Because the author addresses and rejects most of the arguments accepted by the Court, the Note may be read as a criticism of the Court's decision.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

RICO is the acronym for Title IX of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, entitled "Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations."'Congress enacted RICO primarily to combat organized crime, specifically racketeering activity.2 RICO prohibits:(1) conducting the affairs or participating in the conduct of the affairs of an enterprise engaged in or affecting interstate commerce through a pattern of racketeering activity;(2) acquiring or maintaining an interest in such an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity;(3) using funds obtained through a pattern of racketeering activity to invest in any such enterprise.RICO also makes it illegal to conspire to engage in any of the foregoing conduct.3 "Racketeering activity" includes certain enumerated criminal acts under federal or state law. 4 Besides providing for criminal * Editors' Note: Well into the publication of this Note, the United States Supreme Court decided that state courts have concurrent jurisdiction over civil RICO claims in Tafflin v. Levitt, No. 88-1650 (Jan.22, 1990) (LEXIS, Genfed library, US file).Because the author addresses and rejects most of the arguments accepted by the Court, the Note may be read as a criticism of the Court's decision.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

RICO is the acronym for Title IX of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, entitled "Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations."'Congress enacted RICO primarily to combat organized crime, specifically racketeering activity.2 RICO prohibits:(1) conducting the affairs or participating in the conduct of the affairs of an enterprise engaged in or affecting interstate commerce through a pattern of racketeering activity;(2) acquiring or maintaining an interest in such an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity;(3) using funds obtained through a pattern of racketeering activity to invest in any such enterprise.RICO also makes it illegal to conspire to engage in any of the foregoing conduct.3 "Racketeering activity" includes certain enumerated criminal acts under federal or state law. 4 Besides providing for criminal * Editors' Note: Well into the publication of this Note, the United States Supreme Court decided that state courts have concurrent jurisdiction over civil RICO claims in Tafflin v. Levitt, No. 88-1650 (Jan.22, 1990) (LEXIS, Genfed library, US file).Because the author addresses and rejects most of the arguments accepted by the Court, the Note may be read as a criticism of the Court's decision.

Key concepts: Law, Jurisdiction, Political science, Conflict of laws, Civil procedure

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Exclusive or Concurrent Jurisdiction Over Private Civil RICO Actions: Finding the Appropriate Reference — Research Paper | ScholarLens