2006Transportation Research Board 86th Annual MeetingTransportation Research BoardRequires access

How to Pay for Transportation? A Survey of Public Preferences

Asha Weinstein, Jennifer Dill

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

States around the nation have been unwilling to raise fuel taxes high enough to cover desired levels of transportation expenditures, thus pushing state and local governments to look for new sources such as sales taxes and tolls. Another outcome of legislative reluctance to raise taxes or fees has been to put any potential revenue measure before the voters. As a result of these trends, transportation agencies are more and more searching for revenue options that have strong public support. This paper investigates how strongly California residents support a range of revenue options to fund transportation, including taxes and fees, bonds, and tolling. The analysis is based on results from telephone surveys of California residents. The surveys revealed fairly strong public support for some tolling options. Among the tax and fee options, the most popular was to increase vehicle registration fees by a variable amount depending on the vehicle’s air pollutant emissions and gas mileage. Three tax options – gas taxes, sales taxes, and the vehicle license fee – had virtually the same levels of overall support, about 40%. The analysis of demographic and other factors provides further insights. Overall, the survey provides some optimism for implementing new options, such as tolling, and more traditional options of user fees. The positive reaction to linking fees with environmental objectives should be explored further by researchers and policy makers.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

States around the nation have been unwilling to raise fuel taxes high enough to cover desired levels of transportation expenditures, thus pushing state and local governments to look for new sources such as sales taxes and tolls. Another outcome of legislative reluctance to raise taxes or fees has been to put any potential revenue measure before the voters. As a result of these trends, transportation agencies are more and more searching for revenue options that have strong public support. This paper investigates how strongly California residents support a range of revenue options to fund transportation, including taxes and fees, bonds, and tolling. The analysis is based on results from telephone surveys of California residents. The surveys revealed fairly strong public support for some tolling options. Among the tax and fee options, the most popular was to increase vehicle registration fees by a variable amount depending on the vehicle’s air pollutant emissions and gas mileage. Three tax options – gas taxes, sales taxes, and the vehicle license fee – had virtually the same levels of overall support, about 40%. The analysis of demographic and other factors provides further insights. Overall, the survey provides some optimism for implementing new options, such as tolling, and more traditional options of user fees. The positive reaction to linking fees with environmental objectives should be explored further by researchers and policy makers.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

States around the nation have been unwilling to raise fuel taxes high enough to cover desired levels of transportation expenditures, thus pushing state and local governments to look for new sources such as sales taxes and tolls. Another outcome of legislative reluctance to raise taxes or fees has been to put any potential revenue measure before the voters. As a result of these trends, transportation agencies are more and more searching for revenue options that have strong public support. This paper investigates how strongly California residents support a range of revenue options to fund transportation, including taxes and fees, bonds, and tolling. The analysis is based on results from telephone surveys of California residents. The surveys revealed fairly strong public support for some tolling options. Among the tax and fee options, the most popular was to increase vehicle registration fees by a variable amount depending on the vehicle’s air pollutant emissions and gas mileage. Three tax options – gas taxes, sales taxes, and the vehicle license fee – had virtually the same levels of overall support, about 40%. The analysis of demographic and other factors provides further insights. Overall, the survey provides some optimism for implementing new options, such as tolling, and more traditional options of user fees. The positive reaction to linking fees with environmental objectives should be explored further by researchers and policy makers.

Key concepts: Revenue, License, Business, Alternative fuel vehicle, Sales tax, Tax revenue, Finance, Public economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
How to Pay for Transportation? A Survey of Public Preferences — Research Paper | ScholarLens