1990Journal of Aging & Social PolicyRequires access

Old and Poor

Karen C. Davis, Diane Rowland

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Despite an overall decline in the rate of poverty among elderly people in recent decades, certain subgroups of the elderly still suffer from high poverty rates. These include elders living alone, minorities, the very old, and widows. The gap between these vulnerable subgroups and more affluent elders is expected to grow in the decades to come. The most important tool available to policymakers seeking to reduce elderly poverty is the SSI program. An increase in benefit levels is recommended as well as a vigorous outreach program, because about half of elders apparently eligible are not participants. A second important tool is Medicaid. As of 1984, only 29% of poor elders, and 8% of near-poor elders, received Medicaid coverage to fill gaps in Medicare. Remedial measures are outlined. Altogether, at an estimated annual cost of only $5 billion, the United States could eliminated elderly poverty and assure that no elderly person is driven into poverty by burdensome medical expenses.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Despite an overall decline in the rate of poverty among elderly people in recent decades, certain subgroups of the elderly still suffer from high poverty rates. These include elders living alone, minorities, the very old, and widows. The gap between these vulnerable subgroups and more affluent elders is expected to grow in the decades to come. The most important tool available to policymakers seeking to reduce elderly poverty is the SSI program. An increase in benefit levels is recommended as well as a vigorous outreach program, because about half of elders apparently eligible are not participants. A second important tool is Medicaid. As of 1984, only 29% of poor elders, and 8% of near-poor elders, received Medicaid coverage to fill gaps in Medicare. Remedial measures are outlined. Altogether, at an estimated annual cost of only $5 billion, the United States could eliminated elderly poverty and assure that no elderly person is driven into poverty by burdensome medical expenses.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Despite an overall decline in the rate of poverty among elderly people in recent decades, certain subgroups of the elderly still suffer from high poverty rates. These include elders living alone, minorities, the very old, and widows. The gap between these vulnerable subgroups and more affluent elders is expected to grow in the decades to come. The most important tool available to policymakers seeking to reduce elderly poverty is the SSI program. An increase in benefit levels is recommended as well as a vigorous outreach program, because about half of elders apparently eligible are not participants. A second important tool is Medicaid. As of 1984, only 29% of poor elders, and 8% of near-poor elders, received Medicaid coverage to fill gaps in Medicare. Remedial measures are outlined. Altogether, at an estimated annual cost of only $5 billion, the United States could eliminated elderly poverty and assure that no elderly person is driven into poverty by burdensome medical expenses.

Key concepts: Medicaid, Poverty, Outreach, Poverty level, Gerontology, Medicine, Remedial education, Poverty rate

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Old and Poor — Research Paper | ScholarLens