2007•Duke Law Scholarship Repository (Duke University)Open access

Preemption of State Wildlife Law in Alaska: Where, When, and Why

Julie Lurman, Sanford P. Rabinowitch

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

Preemption is the constitutional doctrine which holds that when federal law and state law conflict, federal law must be followed, and state law must yield.In Alaska, the wildlife law known as the Intensive Management statute is in conflict with federal laws governing national park lands and the management of wildlife on those lands.Preemption requires the State of Alaska to refrain from implementing the Intensive Management statute on national park lands because of the conflict with federal laws.This Article describes the relevant state and federal laws, the preemption doctrine, and the doctrine's application to wildlife management in Alaska.It concludes by stating that Alaska has every right to manage wildlife as it sees fit but must always yield in cases where its laws are preempted by the laws of the United States.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Preemption is the constitutional doctrine which holds that when federal law and state law conflict, federal law must be followed, and state law must yield.In Alaska, the wildlife law known as the Intensive Management statute is in conflict with federal laws governing national park lands and the management of wildlife on those lands.Preemption requires the State of Alaska to refrain from implementing the Intensive Management statute on national park lands because of the conflict with federal laws.This Article describes the relevant state and federal laws, the preemption doctrine, and the doctrine's application to wildlife management in Alaska.It concludes by stating that Alaska has every right to manage wildlife as it sees fit but must always yield in cases where its laws are preempted by the laws of the United States.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Preemption is the constitutional doctrine which holds that when federal law and state law conflict, federal law must be followed, and state law must yield.In Alaska, the wildlife law known as the Intensive Management statute is in conflict with federal laws governing national park lands and the management of wildlife on those lands.Preemption requires the State of Alaska to refrain from implementing the Intensive Management statute on national park lands because of the conflict with federal laws.This Article describes the relevant state and federal laws, the preemption doctrine, and the doctrine's application to wildlife management in Alaska.It concludes by stating that Alaska has every right to manage wildlife as it sees fit but must always yield in cases where its laws are preempted by the laws of the United States.

Key concepts: Statute, Law, Doctrine, Preemption, Public trust doctrine, Supremacy Clause, Federal law, State (computer science)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Preemption of State Wildlife Law in Alaska: Where, When, and Why — Research Paper | ScholarLens