Simulation of Beam Loss in Rapid and Slow Cycling Synchrotrons
S. Machida
Abstract
S. Machida
Abstract
Simulation methods for a rapid cycling and a slow cycling synchrotron have to be different because of physics involved and practical computation time. We will show simulation results in each case. One is a full tracking of a rapid cycling synchrotron with acceleration and errors. That employs a self‐consistent space charge model. The other is a tracking of an injection period that lasts about a second in a slow cycling synchrotron. The so‐called frozen space charge model is a practical way to simulate such a long‐term behavior with space charge effects. We estimate the particle loss rate and discuss the behavior of lost particles.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Simulation methods for a rapid cycling and a slow cycling synchrotron have to be different because of physics involved and practical computation time. We will show simulation results in each case. One is a full tracking of a rapid cycling synchrotron with acceleration and errors. That employs a self‐consistent space charge model. The other is a tracking of an injection period that lasts about a second in a slow cycling synchrotron. The so‐called frozen space charge model is a practical way to simulate such a long‐term behavior with space charge effects. We estimate the particle loss rate and discuss the behavior of lost particles.
Key concepts: Synchrotron, Cycling, Rapid cycling, Space charge, Acceleration, Tracking (education), Computation, Physics