2015PubMedRequires access

Comparison of Surgical Efficacy of Levator Muscle Short- ening and Modified Levator Aponeurosis Tucking in Treat- ing Minimal and Moderate Congenital Blepharoptosis.

Chong Wang, Yanli Wang

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the surgical effect of levator muscle shortening and levator aponeurosis tucking in treating minimal and moderate congenital blepharoptosis. METHODS: Clinical data of 28 patients (40 eyes) diagnosed with mide and moderate congenital blepharoptosis at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Postoperative efficacy was evaluated and statistically compared between these two techniques. RESULTS: During 14 months follow-up, 16 eyes with ptosis undergoing levator muscle shortening were treated, 3 with undercorrection of ptosis and 1 with overcorrection of ptosis. In patients receiving levator aponeurosis tucking, 16 eyes were cured and 4 with undercorrection of ptosis. CONCLUSION: Both levator muscle shortening and levator aponeurosis tucking are safe and efficacious for correcting minimal and moderate congenital blepharoptosis. (Eye Science

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: To evaluate the surgical effect of levator muscle shortening and levator aponeurosis tucking in treating minimal and moderate congenital blepharoptosis. METHODS: Clinical data of 28 patients (40 eyes) diagnosed with mide and moderate congenital blepharoptosis at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Postoperative efficacy was evaluated and statistically compared between these two techniques. RESULTS: During 14 months follow-up, 16 eyes with ptosis undergoing levator muscle shortening were treated, 3 with undercorrection of ptosis and 1 with overcorrection of ptosis. In patients receiving levator aponeurosis tucking, 16 eyes were cured and 4 with undercorrection of ptosis. CONCLUSION: Both levator muscle shortening and levator aponeurosis tucking are safe and efficacious for correcting minimal and moderate congenital blepharoptosis. (Eye Science

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the surgical effect of levator muscle shortening and levator aponeurosis tucking in treating minimal and moderate congenital blepharoptosis. METHODS: Clinical data of 28 patients (40 eyes) diagnosed with mide and moderate congenital blepharoptosis at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Postoperative efficacy was evaluated and statistically compared between these two techniques. RESULTS: During 14 months follow-up, 16 eyes with ptosis undergoing levator muscle shortening were treated, 3 with undercorrection of ptosis and 1 with overcorrection of ptosis. In patients receiving levator aponeurosis tucking, 16 eyes were cured and 4 with undercorrection of ptosis. CONCLUSION: Both levator muscle shortening and levator aponeurosis tucking are safe and efficacious for correcting minimal and moderate congenital blepharoptosis. (Eye Science

Key concepts: Aponeurosis, Medicine, Ptosis, Surgery, Anatomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Surgical Efficacy of Levator Muscle Short- ening and Modified Levator Aponeurosis Tucking in Treat- ing Minimal and Moderate Congenital Blepharoptosis. — Research Paper | ScholarLens