1997Monash University Press eBooksRequires access

In Search of Majapahit: The Transformation of Balinese Identities

Helen Creese

Open publisher page 23 citations

Abstract

Majapahit is one of the cornerstones of Balinese identity. For at least the last 300 years, both indigenous and Western discourses have created a definition of Balinese culture and identity in which links to the high culture of Java - epitomised by Majapahit - are central. Like all images, this Bali-Majapahit link has been and remains a dynamic one, constantly redefined and refined to suit changing political and social contexts. The notion of the Javanese origins of Balinese cultural identity is very clear in Balinese sources, although the image of Majapahit itself is in fact much more subdued than the continuing discussion of it in much 19th and 20th century historiographical writing about Bali implies. This focus on Majapahit has perhaps received its most recent boost through the work of Clifford Geertz (1980), who depicts the Balinese court centres of the 19th century as failed replicas of a Majapahit model. This depiction stands in marked contrast to indigenous portrayals of the period in which Balinese courts are successful because they are like Majapahit, not because they fail to live up to an unattainable ideal. In the 20th century, however, the close link between Bali and Java has again slipped to the background of Balinese interests as new concerns - particularly those caught up in the modern ideologies of nation-state, regional history and world religion - have come to the fore. There exists a wealth of textual data for the study of evolving Balinese identities, although since much of it is anonymous and undated, it is not always clear which texts or versions of texts have undergone reinterpretation since the time of their original composition. Some significant threads, however, weave backwards and forwards through these textual traditions. The most prominent of these is the notion of 'Jawa' which, as Vickers (1986: 274-288) has shown, refers both specifically to the island of Java, and, in a more general sense, to the world 'outside' Bali. By charting some of the Balinese Javacentric discourse of the 18th and 19th centuries, this paper seeks to explore how 'Jawa' - exemplified by Majapahit but embracing all aspects of the cultural, political and social heritage of centuries of contact - is projected in Balinese textual traditions. The paper also attempts a preliminary analysis of the changing focus of Balinese historiography in the evolution of modern Balinese identities, now that the Indonesian state has appropriated and pigeon-holed Majapahit-Java for its own glorious past.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Majapahit is one of the cornerstones of Balinese identity. For at least the last 300 years, both indigenous and Western discourses have created a definition of Balinese culture and identity in which links to the high culture of Java - epitomised by Majapahit - are central. Like all images, this Bali-Majapahit link has been and remains a dynamic one, constantly redefined and refined to suit changing political and social contexts. The notion of the Javanese origins of Balinese cultural identity is very clear in Balinese sources, although the image of Majapahit itself is in fact much more subdued than the continuing discussion of it in much 19th and 20th century historiographical writing about Bali implies. This focus on Majapahit has perhaps received its most recent boost through the work of Clifford Geertz (1980), who depicts the Balinese court centres of the 19th century as failed replicas of a Majapahit model. This depiction stands in marked contrast to indigenous portrayals of the period in which Balinese courts are successful because they are like Majapahit, not because they fail to live up to an unattainable ideal. In the 20th century, however, the close link between Bali and Java has again slipped to the background of Balinese interests as new concerns - particularly those caught up in the modern ideologies of nation-state, regional history and world religion - have come to the fore. There exists a wealth of textual data for the study of evolving Balinese identities, although since much of it is anonymous and undated, it is not always clear which texts or versions of texts have undergone reinterpretation since the time of their original composition. Some significant threads, however, weave backwards and forwards through these textual traditions. The most prominent of these is the notion of 'Jawa' which, as Vickers (1986: 274-288) has shown, refers both specifically to the island of Java, and, in a more general sense, to the world 'outside' Bali. By charting some of the Balinese Javacentric discourse of the 18th and 19th centuries, this paper seeks to explore how 'Jawa' - exemplified by Majapahit but embracing all aspects of the cultural, political and social heritage of centuries of contact - is projected in Balinese textual traditions. The paper also attempts a preliminary analysis of the changing focus of Balinese historiography in the evolution of modern Balinese identities, now that the Indonesian state has appropriated and pigeon-holed Majapahit-Java for its own glorious past.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 23 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Majapahit is one of the cornerstones of Balinese identity. For at least the last 300 years, both indigenous and Western discourses have created a definition of Balinese culture and identity in which links to the high culture of Java - epitomised by Majapahit - are central. Like all images, this Bali-Majapahit link has been and remains a dynamic one, constantly redefined and refined to suit changing political and social contexts. The notion of the Javanese origins of Balinese cultural identity is very clear in Balinese sources, although the image of Majapahit itself is in fact much more subdued than the continuing discussion of it in much 19th and 20th century historiographical writing about Bali implies. This focus on Majapahit has perhaps received its most recent boost through the work of Clifford Geertz (1980), who depicts the Balinese court centres of the 19th century as failed replicas of a Majapahit model. This depiction stands in marked contrast to indigenous portrayals of the period in which Balinese courts are successful because they are like Majapahit, not because they fail to live up to an unattainable ideal. In the 20th century, however, the close link between Bali and Java has again slipped to the background of Balinese interests as new concerns - particularly those caught up in the modern ideologies of nation-state, regional history and world religion - have come to the fore. There exists a wealth of textual data for the study of evolving Balinese identities, although since much of it is anonymous and undated, it is not always clear which texts or versions of texts have undergone reinterpretation since the time of their original composition. Some significant threads, however, weave backwards and forwards through these textual traditions. The most prominent of these is the notion of 'Jawa' which, as Vickers (1986: 274-288) has shown, refers both specifically to the island of Java, and, in a more general sense, to the world 'outside' Bali. By charting some of the Balinese Javacentric discourse of the 18th and 19th centuries, this paper seeks to explore how 'Jawa' - exemplified by Majapahit but embracing all aspects of the cultural, political and social heritage of centuries of contact - is projected in Balinese textual traditions. The paper also attempts a preliminary analysis of the changing focus of Balinese historiography in the evolution of modern Balinese identities, now that the Indonesian state has appropriated and pigeon-holed Majapahit-Java for its own glorious past.

Key concepts: Indigenous, Identity (music), Ideology, History, Aesthetics, Politics, Ancient history, Art

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
In Search of Majapahit: The Transformation of Balinese Identities — Research Paper | ScholarLens