2002Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Sex allocation in hermaphrodite plants

Peter G. L. Klinkhamer, Tom J. de Jong

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

The flowers of hermaphrodite plants have both male and female parts. Hermaphrodite plants can change their allocation to both sexual functions in various ways, such as by changing the production ratios of pollen grains to ovules within flowers and of flowers to fruits. We discuss the problems involved in measuring sex allocation, trade-offs and fitness gain curves and present a simple model for the evolutionary stable allocation to fruits and flowers. The model provides an explanation for the low fruit-to-flower ratio found in many species and for the increasing allocation to female function with increasing selfing rate. Theoretical models predict that evolutionary stable sex allocation depends on plant size and this prediction is supported by literature data on monocarpic hermaphrodites and on monoecious species. Introduction By far the most common mode of plant reproduction is through hermaphrodite flowers. Although such flowers serve both male and female functions, this does not mean that hermaphrodites are invariant in their sexual behaviour. Substantial variation in intraspecific sex allocation has been found and related to environmental conditions or plant size. A large body of theoretical literature is now accumulating that predicts how allocation to male and female reproduction should vary with a variety of factors such as pollination type, resource status, selfing rate, selective abortion, population structure, dispersal mechanisms, etc. Unfortunately empirical evidence lags far behind, mostly because the required measurements are notoriously difficult to collect and the methods full of pitfalls.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The flowers of hermaphrodite plants have both male and female parts. Hermaphrodite plants can change their allocation to both sexual functions in various ways, such as by changing the production ratios of pollen grains to ovules within flowers and of flowers to fruits. We discuss the problems involved in measuring sex allocation, trade-offs and fitness gain curves and present a simple model for the evolutionary stable allocation to fruits and flowers. The model provides an explanation for the low fruit-to-flower ratio found in many species and for the increasing allocation to female function with increasing selfing rate. Theoretical models predict that evolutionary stable sex allocation depends on plant size and this prediction is supported by literature data on monocarpic hermaphrodites and on monoecious species. Introduction By far the most common mode of plant reproduction is through hermaphrodite flowers. Although such flowers serve both male and female functions, this does not mean that hermaphrodites are invariant in their sexual behaviour. Substantial variation in intraspecific sex allocation has been found and related to environmental conditions or plant size. A large body of theoretical literature is now accumulating that predicts how allocation to male and female reproduction should vary with a variety of factors such as pollination type, resource status, selfing rate, selective abortion, population structure, dispersal mechanisms, etc. Unfortunately empirical evidence lags far behind, mostly because the required measurements are notoriously difficult to collect and the methods full of pitfalls.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The flowers of hermaphrodite plants have both male and female parts. Hermaphrodite plants can change their allocation to both sexual functions in various ways, such as by changing the production ratios of pollen grains to ovules within flowers and of flowers to fruits. We discuss the problems involved in measuring sex allocation, trade-offs and fitness gain curves and present a simple model for the evolutionary stable allocation to fruits and flowers. The model provides an explanation for the low fruit-to-flower ratio found in many species and for the increasing allocation to female function with increasing selfing rate. Theoretical models predict that evolutionary stable sex allocation depends on plant size and this prediction is supported by literature data on monocarpic hermaphrodites and on monoecious species. Introduction By far the most common mode of plant reproduction is through hermaphrodite flowers. Although such flowers serve both male and female functions, this does not mean that hermaphrodites are invariant in their sexual behaviour. Substantial variation in intraspecific sex allocation has been found and related to environmental conditions or plant size. A large body of theoretical literature is now accumulating that predicts how allocation to male and female reproduction should vary with a variety of factors such as pollination type, resource status, selfing rate, selective abortion, population structure, dispersal mechanisms, etc. Unfortunately empirical evidence lags far behind, mostly because the required measurements are notoriously difficult to collect and the methods full of pitfalls.

Key concepts: Hermaphrodite, Sex allocation, Selfing, Plant reproductive morphology, Biology, Pollen, Time allocation, Gynodioecy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sex allocation in hermaphrodite plants — Research Paper | ScholarLens