1989Unpublished venueRequires access

Predictive vs. Structural Modeling: PLS vs. ML

Jan-Bernd Lohmöller

Open publisher page 277 citations

Abstract

The Latent Variables Path (LVP) model and also the first viable estimation technique were developed by Karl Jöreskog (from 1973 onwards). Right from the beginning his LISREL method was of the utmost elegance and perfection, as regards the deductive properties of the model. The LISREL program has since been gradually improved (LISREL III: Jöreskog & van Thillo 1973; LISREL VII: Jöreskog & Sörbom 1987), as regards convenience for the user, additional estimation criteria and model diagnostics. However, one inconvenient side of LISREL, well known to all users, is incurable: LISREL tends to produce improper solutions characterized by negative variance estimates and LV correlations greater than unity (van Driel 1978, Jöreskog 1981, Fornell & Bookstein 1982, Rindskopf 1983, 1984). These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Latent Variables Path (LVP) model and also the first viable estimation technique were developed by Karl Jöreskog (from 1973 onwards). Right from the beginning his LISREL method was of the utmost elegance and perfection, as regards the deductive properties of the model. The LISREL program has since been gradually improved (LISREL III: Jöreskog & van Thillo 1973; LISREL VII: Jöreskog & Sörbom 1987), as regards convenience for the user, additional estimation criteria and model diagnostics. However, one inconvenient side of LISREL, well known to all users, is incurable: LISREL tends to produce improper solutions characterized by negative variance estimates and LV correlations greater than unity (van Driel 1978, Jöreskog 1981, Fornell & Bookstein 1982, Rindskopf 1983, 1984). These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 277 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Latent Variables Path (LVP) model and also the first viable estimation technique were developed by Karl Jöreskog (from 1973 onwards). Right from the beginning his LISREL method was of the utmost elegance and perfection, as regards the deductive properties of the model. The LISREL program has since been gradually improved (LISREL III: Jöreskog & van Thillo 1973; LISREL VII: Jöreskog & Sörbom 1987), as regards convenience for the user, additional estimation criteria and model diagnostics. However, one inconvenient side of LISREL, well known to all users, is incurable: LISREL tends to produce improper solutions characterized by negative variance estimates and LV correlations greater than unity (van Driel 1978, Jöreskog 1981, Fornell & Bookstein 1982, Rindskopf 1983, 1984). These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: LISREL, Econometrics, Structural equation modeling, Variance (accounting), Latent variable, Statistics, Mathematics, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Predictive vs. Structural Modeling: PLS vs. ML — Research Paper | ScholarLens