2015•bepress Legal RepositoryOpen access

Choosing the "Per-Debtor" Approach to Plan Confirmation in Multi-Debtor Chapter 11 Proceedings

Suzanne T. Brindise

Open full text 14 citations

Abstract

Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code sets forth the procedures necessary for corporations to reorganize.To ensure that the bankruptcy process and proposed reorganization plan are fair, Chapter 11 mandates that certain requirements are met before confirmation of a reorganization plan can be achieved.Section 1129(a)(10) represents one of those requirements.Specifically, § 1129(a)(10) requires at least one impaired class of claims to vote in favor of the reorganization plan in order for it to be confirmed.Applying § 1129(a)(10) is relatively simple in bankruptcy proceedings involving a single debtor; however, its application is much more complicated in bankruptcy proceedings involving multiple debtors.As multi-debtor bankruptcy proceedings have become increasingly common, courts have begun to debate whether § 1129(a)(10) requires an impaired class from each debtor to vote in favor of a proposed reorganization plan in a jointly administered, multi-debtor Chapter 11 proceeding, or whether it requires only one impaired class from across all debtors to vote in favor of it.The former option is known as the "per-debtor" approach, and the latter as the "per-plan" approach.This Comment argues for the adoption of the per-debtor approach.In particular, it urges that the per-debtor approach more accurately aligns with the plain meaning and statutory construction of Chapter 11, more closely follows the purpose and underlying safeguards at work within the Bankruptcy Code, and better serves the interests and rights of the parties involved.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code sets forth the procedures necessary for corporations to reorganize.To ensure that the bankruptcy process and proposed reorganization plan are fair, Chapter 11 mandates that certain requirements are met before confirmation of a reorganization plan can be achieved.Section 1129(a)(10) represents one of those requirements.Specifically, § 1129(a)(10) requires at least one impaired class of claims to vote in favor of the reorganization plan in order for it to be confirmed.Applying § 1129(a)(10) is relatively simple in bankruptcy proceedings involving a single debtor; however, its application is much more complicated in bankruptcy proceedings involving multiple debtors.As multi-debtor bankruptcy proceedings have become increasingly common, courts have begun to debate whether § 1129(a)(10) requires an impaired class from each debtor to vote in favor of a proposed reorganization plan in a jointly administered, multi-debtor Chapter 11 proceeding, or whether it requires only one impaired class from across all debtors to vote in favor of it.The former option is known as the "per-debtor" approach, and the latter as the "per-plan" approach.This Comment argues for the adoption of the per-debtor approach.In particular, it urges that the per-debtor approach more accurately aligns with the plain meaning and statutory construction of Chapter 11, more closely follows the purpose and underlying safeguards at work within the Bankruptcy Code, and better serves the interests and rights of the parties involved.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code sets forth the procedures necessary for corporations to reorganize.To ensure that the bankruptcy process and proposed reorganization plan are fair, Chapter 11 mandates that certain requirements are met before confirmation of a reorganization plan can be achieved.Section 1129(a)(10) represents one of those requirements.Specifically, § 1129(a)(10) requires at least one impaired class of claims to vote in favor of the reorganization plan in order for it to be confirmed.Applying § 1129(a)(10) is relatively simple in bankruptcy proceedings involving a single debtor; however, its application is much more complicated in bankruptcy proceedings involving multiple debtors.As multi-debtor bankruptcy proceedings have become increasingly common, courts have begun to debate whether § 1129(a)(10) requires an impaired class from each debtor to vote in favor of a proposed reorganization plan in a jointly administered, multi-debtor Chapter 11 proceeding, or whether it requires only one impaired class from across all debtors to vote in favor of it.The former option is known as the "per-debtor" approach, and the latter as the "per-plan" approach.This Comment argues for the adoption of the per-debtor approach.In particular, it urges that the per-debtor approach more accurately aligns with the plain meaning and statutory construction of Chapter 11, more closely follows the purpose and underlying safeguards at work within the Bankruptcy Code, and better serves the interests and rights of the parties involved.

Key concepts: Debtor, Bankruptcy, Statutory law, Law and economics, Law, Business, Political science, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Choosing the "Per-Debtor" Approach to Plan Confirmation in Multi-Debtor Chapter 11 Proceedings — Research Paper | ScholarLens