WHAT KIND OF UPPER-STAGE PROPULSION FOR MARS MISSIONS
Aaron Cohen, L.S. Beers
Abstract
Aaron Cohen, L.S. Beers
Abstract
A comparison of chemical, nuclear heat transfer, and electrical propulsion systems for Mars missions is presented. A probe, Mars orbiters, and soft-landing missions were selected as best typifying the energy requirements. The use of chemical upper stages with Atlas-Centaur booster, electric propulsion with Saturn C-1B, and nuclear or electric propulsion with Saturn C-5 and Nova is indicated for the 1965-1980 period. (C.E.S.)
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A comparison of chemical, nuclear heat transfer, and electrical propulsion systems for Mars missions is presented. A probe, Mars orbiters, and soft-landing missions were selected as best typifying the energy requirements. The use of chemical upper stages with Atlas-Centaur booster, electric propulsion with Saturn C-1B, and nuclear or electric propulsion with Saturn C-5 and Nova is indicated for the 1965-1980 period. (C.E.S.)
Key concepts: Mars Exploration Program, Propulsion, Booster (rocketry), Titan (rocket family), Electrically powered spacecraft propulsion, Astrobiology, Exploration of Mars, Saturn