1969Unpublished venueOpen access

THE PROCESS OF DEVELOPING AND IMPROVING COURSE CONTENT FOR MILITARY TECHNICAL TRAINING

Harold G. Hunter, J. Daniel Lyons, Eugene F. MacCaslin, Jr. Smith, Wagner Robert G., Harold

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

Curriculum development procedures in use as of 1966 for first- enlistment technical training in the Army, Navy, and Air Force are analyzed. A model process for training curriculum development was defined from training research findings and practices: (a) Analyze the system, (b) develop task inventories, (c) develop a job model, (d) analyze its tasks, (e) derive training objectives, (f) develop the training program, and (g) monitor the trained product and modify the curriculum. A comparison between this model and the training development procedures in use in the services indicated a need for (a) better procedures for determining the adequacy of training content and the means for improvement; (b) detailed guidance for developing or conducting the first four steps of the model process, criteria for allocating training content to formal instruction or on-the-job learning, performance specifications for graduates, and feedback from training programs; and (c) more opportunities for career fields in training.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Curriculum development procedures in use as of 1966 for first- enlistment technical training in the Army, Navy, and Air Force are analyzed. A model process for training curriculum development was defined from training research findings and practices: (a) Analyze the system, (b) develop task inventories, (c) develop a job model, (d) analyze its tasks, (e) derive training objectives, (f) develop the training program, and (g) monitor the trained product and modify the curriculum. A comparison between this model and the training development procedures in use in the services indicated a need for (a) better procedures for determining the adequacy of training content and the means for improvement; (b) detailed guidance for developing or conducting the first four steps of the model process, criteria for allocating training content to formal instruction or on-the-job learning, performance specifications for graduates, and feedback from training programs; and (c) more opportunities for career fields in training.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Curriculum development procedures in use as of 1966 for first- enlistment technical training in the Army, Navy, and Air Force are analyzed. A model process for training curriculum development was defined from training research findings and practices: (a) Analyze the system, (b) develop task inventories, (c) develop a job model, (d) analyze its tasks, (e) derive training objectives, (f) develop the training program, and (g) monitor the trained product and modify the curriculum. A comparison between this model and the training development procedures in use in the services indicated a need for (a) better procedures for determining the adequacy of training content and the means for improvement; (b) detailed guidance for developing or conducting the first four steps of the model process, criteria for allocating training content to formal instruction or on-the-job learning, performance specifications for graduates, and feedback from training programs; and (c) more opportunities for career fields in training.

Key concepts: Course (navigation), Process (computing), Training (meteorology), Computer science, Instructional design, Multimedia, Content (measure theory), Mathematics education

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
THE PROCESS OF DEVELOPING AND IMPROVING COURSE CONTENT FOR MILITARY TECHNICAL TRAINING — Research Paper | ScholarLens