1985PubMedRequires access

Comparison of naproxen and piroxicam in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a double-blind, crossover study.

K Chlud, S Pangerl

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

A double-blind, crossover study was carried out in 50 patients with rheumatoid arthritis to compare the efficacy and tolerance of single evening doses of 1000 mg naproxen and 20 mg piroxicam. After an initial wash-out period of 1 week, patients received 4-weeks' treatment with one or other of the trial drugs and were then crossed over after a 1-week wash-out period to the alternative medication for a further 4 weeks. Objective assessments of disease activity and patients' and physician's assessments of therapeutic response were made at the end of each wash-out and active treatment period, and at the end of the trial patients and physician were asked to say which of the two active treatments was preferred. Forty-nine patients completed the 10-week trial; one patient discontinued the study while on piroxicam therapy because of side-effects. While both treatments proved effective, naproxen was statistically significantly better than piroxicam for total joint pain, grip strength, duration of morning stiffness, and overall therapeutic response. Naproxen also had a more rapid and more pronounced action than did piroxicam and was selected as the preferred drug by both patients and physicians. Patients taking naproxen reported slightly fewer side-effects than did those taking piroxicam.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A double-blind, crossover study was carried out in 50 patients with rheumatoid arthritis to compare the efficacy and tolerance of single evening doses of 1000 mg naproxen and 20 mg piroxicam. After an initial wash-out period of 1 week, patients received 4-weeks' treatment with one or other of the trial drugs and were then crossed over after a 1-week wash-out period to the alternative medication for a further 4 weeks. Objective assessments of disease activity and patients' and physician's assessments of therapeutic response were made at the end of each wash-out and active treatment period, and at the end of the trial patients and physician were asked to say which of the two active treatments was preferred. Forty-nine patients completed the 10-week trial; one patient discontinued the study while on piroxicam therapy because of side-effects. While both treatments proved effective, naproxen was statistically significantly better than piroxicam for total joint pain, grip strength, duration of morning stiffness, and overall therapeutic response. Naproxen also had a more rapid and more pronounced action than did piroxicam and was selected as the preferred drug by both patients and physicians. Patients taking naproxen reported slightly fewer side-effects than did those taking piroxicam.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A double-blind, crossover study was carried out in 50 patients with rheumatoid arthritis to compare the efficacy and tolerance of single evening doses of 1000 mg naproxen and 20 mg piroxicam. After an initial wash-out period of 1 week, patients received 4-weeks' treatment with one or other of the trial drugs and were then crossed over after a 1-week wash-out period to the alternative medication for a further 4 weeks. Objective assessments of disease activity and patients' and physician's assessments of therapeutic response were made at the end of each wash-out and active treatment period, and at the end of the trial patients and physician were asked to say which of the two active treatments was preferred. Forty-nine patients completed the 10-week trial; one patient discontinued the study while on piroxicam therapy because of side-effects. While both treatments proved effective, naproxen was statistically significantly better than piroxicam for total joint pain, grip strength, duration of morning stiffness, and overall therapeutic response. Naproxen also had a more rapid and more pronounced action than did piroxicam and was selected as the preferred drug by both patients and physicians. Patients taking naproxen reported slightly fewer side-effects than did those taking piroxicam.

Key concepts: Piroxicam, Naproxen, Medicine, Rheumatoid arthritis, Crossover study, Evening, Internal medicine, Double blind

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of naproxen and piroxicam in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a double-blind, crossover study. — Research Paper | ScholarLens