1962OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Requires access

A TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF SOLID-FUEL GASIFICATION USING NUCLEAR HEAT. PRODUCTION OF PIPELINE GAS, LIQUID FUELS, AND CHEMICALS FROM LIGNITE AND BITUMINOUS COAL. Period Covered: May to October 1962

L. Pieroni, R.P. Griffin, W.H. Heffner

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Results are reported of a study to determine the most economical method of utilizing nuclear heat to gasify a North Dakota lignite and a West Virginia bituminous coal so that the resulting gas is suitable as a source of synthesis gas for fuels and chemicals. Heat is transferred from a high-temperature, gas- cooled nuclear reactor to the solid-fuel gasification plant by a stream of 435- psig helium heated to a maximum temperature of 2500 un. Concent 85% F. There is no in-reactor processing involved, hence radioactivity in the processing plant is assumed to be negligible. Design of the nuclear reactor is beyond the scope of this study. It was concluded that the gasification may be carried out more economically in a fluidized bed containing immersed heat-transfer tubes than in either a fixed-bed or an entrained-bed gasifier. If nuclear heat costs no more than 95 cents per million Btu, pipeline gas can be produced at lower cost than by any steamoxygen gasification process, but still not cheaply enough to compete with natural gas at the present time. Production of gasoline is not economically attractive. (auth)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Results are reported of a study to determine the most economical method of utilizing nuclear heat to gasify a North Dakota lignite and a West Virginia bituminous coal so that the resulting gas is suitable as a source of synthesis gas for fuels and chemicals. Heat is transferred from a high-temperature, gas- cooled nuclear reactor to the solid-fuel gasification plant by a stream of 435- psig helium heated to a maximum temperature of 2500 un. Concent 85% F. There is no in-reactor processing involved, hence radioactivity in the processing plant is assumed to be negligible. Design of the nuclear reactor is beyond the scope of this study. It was concluded that the gasification may be carried out more economically in a fluidized bed containing immersed heat-transfer tubes than in either a fixed-bed or an entrained-bed gasifier. If nuclear heat costs no more than 95 cents per million Btu, pipeline gas can be produced at lower cost than by any steamoxygen gasification process, but still not cheaply enough to compete with natural gas at the present time. Production of gasoline is not economically attractive. (auth)

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Results are reported of a study to determine the most economical method of utilizing nuclear heat to gasify a North Dakota lignite and a West Virginia bituminous coal so that the resulting gas is suitable as a source of synthesis gas for fuels and chemicals. Heat is transferred from a high-temperature, gas- cooled nuclear reactor to the solid-fuel gasification plant by a stream of 435- psig helium heated to a maximum temperature of 2500 un. Concent 85% F. There is no in-reactor processing involved, hence radioactivity in the processing plant is assumed to be negligible. Design of the nuclear reactor is beyond the scope of this study. It was concluded that the gasification may be carried out more economically in a fluidized bed containing immersed heat-transfer tubes than in either a fixed-bed or an entrained-bed gasifier. If nuclear heat costs no more than 95 cents per million Btu, pipeline gas can be produced at lower cost than by any steamoxygen gasification process, but still not cheaply enough to compete with natural gas at the present time. Production of gasoline is not economically attractive. (auth)

Key concepts: Waste management, Bituminous coal, Coal gasification, Coal, Environmental science, Fluidized bed, Wood gas generator, Fuel gas

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF SOLID-FUEL GASIFICATION USING NUCLEAR HEAT. PRODUCTION OF PIPELINE GAS, LIQUID FUELS, AND CHEMICALS FROM LIGNITE AND BITUMINOUS COAL. Period Covered: May to October 1962 — Research Paper | ScholarLens